Literature DB >> 4057395

Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases.

J W Segura, D E Patterson, A J LeRoy, H J Williams, D M Barrett, R C Benson, G R May, C E Bender.   

Abstract

We report the results of 1,000 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous removal of renal and ureteral stones. Removal was successful for 98.3 per cent of the targeted renal stones and 88.2 per cent of the ureteral stones. Complications, evolution and technique are discussed. Percutaneous techniques are an effective way to handle the majority of renal calculi and these techniques will continue to be important as shock wave lithotripsy becomes more widespread in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4057395     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47633-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  66 in total

1.  Does previous stone treatment in children generate a disadvantage or just the opposite?

Authors:  Onur Telli; Perviz Haciyev; Seymur Karimov; Hasmet Sarici; Tolga Karakan; Berat Cem Ozgur; Arif Demirbas; Berkan Resorlu; Tarkan Soygur; Berk Burgu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review.

Authors:  Kyle Wood; Tristan Keys; Patrick Mufarrij; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

3.  Urologists versus radiologists made PCNL tracts: the U.K. experience.

Authors:  Muhammad Z Aslam; Ali Thwaini; Brian Duggan; Ammar Hameed; Colin Mulholland; Hugh O'Kane; Trevor Thompson
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-12-16

4.  Kidney displacement in complete supine PCNL is lower than prone PCNL.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Seyyed Alaeddin Asgari; Hamidreza Nasseh; Aliakbar Allahkhah; Fatemeh Jafari Farshami; Maryam Shakiba; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-10-12

5.  [Clinical value of percutaneous nephrolithotomy].

Authors:  T Knoll; G Wendt-Nordahl; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Percutaneous nephrolithotomy].

Authors:  P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  One-shot versus gradual dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yutao Li; Lu Yang; Peng Xu; Pengfei Shen; Shengqiang Qian; Wuran Wei; Jia Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Alper Gok; Haci Polat; Ali Cift; Mehmet Ozgur Yucel; Bahri Gok; Mehmet Sirik; Can Benlioglu; Bedreddin Kalyenci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Experience of retaining encrusted ureteral stents: URL by 4.5/6.5F ureteroscope can reduce the possibility of PCNL.

Authors:  Zhaohui He; Hanqi Lei; Caixia Zhang; Hangtao Wang; Fucai Tang; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Contemporary practice of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: review of practice in a single region of the UK.

Authors:  Shalom J Srirangam; Richard Darling; Maureen Stopford; Donald Neilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.