Literature DB >> 20938770

Kidney displacement in complete supine PCNL is lower than prone PCNL.

Siavash Falahatkar1, Seyyed Alaeddin Asgari, Hamidreza Nasseh, Aliakbar Allahkhah, Fatemeh Jafari Farshami, Maryam Shakiba, Samaneh Esmaeili.   

Abstract

To compare the amount of the kidney displacement in the complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) to the prone PCNL during getting renal access. Thirty-three patients were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in group A were placed in the complete supine position and the patients in group B in the prone position. Amounts of the kidney displacement in three states and other data were analyzed. The mean amount of the kidney displacement in the complete supine PCNL was 10.1 ± 7.9 mm in stage 1, 10.7 ± 8.28 mm in stage 2 and 12.2 ± 10.4 mm in stage 3. The mean amount of the kidney displacement in prone PCNL was 16.6 ± 5.8 mm in stage 1, 16.2 ± 6.3 mm in stage 2 and 17.6 ± 6.7 mm in stage 3. In stages 1 and 2, a significant difference between the two groups derived from the mean amount of the kidney displacement, but the difference was not statistically significant in stage 3. Adjusted for age, gender, BMI, stone burden and position of PCNL, prone position was a predictor caused significantly more displacement in all three stages. Among other predictors, only BMI had a significant effect on the amount of the kidney displacement (in stages 2 and 3). Performing PCNL in the complete supine position is safe and effective and leads to less kidney displacement during getting renal access and therefore, it may be considered in most patients requiring PCNL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20938770     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0314-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  30 in total

1.  Risk of injury to adjacent organs with lower-pole fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrostomy: evaluation with prone, supine, and multiplanar reformatted CT.

Authors:  Dana N Tuttle; Benjamin M Yeh; Maxwell V Meng; Richard S Breiman; Marshall L Stoller; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  The changing practice of percutaneous stone surgery. Review of 1000 cases 1981-1988.

Authors:  D J Jones; G L Russell; M J Kellett; J E Wickham
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1990-07

3.  Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for renal stones in over 1000 patients.

Authors:  M R el-Kenawy; H A el-Kappany; T A el-Diasty; M A Ghoneim
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1992-05

4.  Percutaneous nephrostomy in supine position.

Authors:  Luigi Cormio; Pasquale Annese; Tommaso Corvasce; Mario De Siati; Francesco P Turri; Fabrizio Lorusso; Salvatore Pentimone; Antonia Perrone; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases.

Authors:  J W Segura; D E Patterson; A J LeRoy; H J Williams; D M Barrett; R C Benson; G R May; C E Bender
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; T A Coury; D M Newman; R J Kahnoski; J H Mertz; P G Mosbaugh; R E Steele; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Totally ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position.

Authors:  Abbas Basiri; Seyed Amir Mohsen Ziaee; Hamidreza Nasseh; Mohammadreza Kamranmanesh; Parham Masoudy; Fatemeh Heidary; Hamidreza Kianian; Mehdi Abedinzadeh
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  W J Lee; A D Smith; V Cubelli; G H Badlani; B Lewin; F Vernace; E Cantos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Outcome of percutaneous surgery stratified according to body mass index and kidney stone size.

Authors:  Igor Sergeyev; Philip T Koi; Stacy L Jacobs; Alla Godelman; David M Hoenig
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.719

10.  Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position.

Authors:  J G Valdivia Uría; J Valle Gerhold; J A López López; S Villarroya Rodriguez; C Ambroj Navarro; M Ramirez Fabián; J M Rodriguez Bazalo; M A Sánchez Elipe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of kidney displacement during supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Incidence, significance, and analysis of predictive factors.

Authors:  Başak Gülpinar; Aykut Akinci; Evren Süer; Adem Sanci; Muammer Babayiğit; Yaşar Bedük; Sümer Baltaci; Mehmet İlker Gökce
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Predictors of excessive renal displacement during access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Reza Haghpanah; Sezaneh Haghpanah
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complete supine flank-free position in comparison to prone position: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Nadeem Sohail; Amjad Albodour; Khalid Mohammed Abdelrahman
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-10-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.