Literature DB >> 28608037

Experience of retaining encrusted ureteral stents: URL by 4.5/6.5F ureteroscope can reduce the possibility of PCNL.

Zhaohui He1,2, Hanqi Lei3,4, Caixia Zhang5, Hangtao Wang3,4, Fucai Tang3,4, Guohua Zeng3,4.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to present our experience of retaining encrusted ureteral stents (EUS) and discuss the effectiveness of 4.5/6.5F ureteroscope (URS) in the procedure. The data of patients with EUS in our center from January 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The inclusion criterion was ureteral stents that required intervention above the ureteral orifice to retain and was proved to be encrusted. Impacted stents would be removed by ureteroscope lithotripsy (URL) via 8/9.8F or 4.5/6.5F URS. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) then be the further step if URL failed. 46 cases of EUS were treated in 36 patients from January 2012 to December 2016 in our institution. All subjects consisted of 18 males and 18 females; the average age was 49.81 ± 16.40 years (range 5-86). The mean time from stent insertion to encrustation was 9.28 ± 17.15 months (range 1-120). URL was performed in 44 cases (95.7%), including 19 cases (41.3%) by 8/9.8F URS and 25 cases (54.4%) by 4.5/6.5F URS due to the conventional URS's failure to get into ureteral orifice or further part of ureter. Two patients (4.3%) underwent PCNL due to the inseparable circle developed by the intra-renal segment of encrusted stents. None of the patients underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and open surgery. All stents were eventually removed without blood transfusion or ureteral injury, except three cases with post-operative fever. All procedures were performed under one-session anesthesia. URL by 4.5/6.5F ureteroscope might increase the success rate of retaining encrusted ureteral stents remarkably, and then reduce the possibility of PCNL effectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Encrusted ureteral stents (EUS); Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL); Ureteroscope lithotripsy (URL)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28608037     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-0990-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of a retained heavily encrusted ureteral stent.

Authors:  Manish Bhansali; Suresh Patankar; Satyen Dobhada
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 2.  Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Jens Jochen Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The effectiveness of 4.5F ultrathin semirigid ureteroscope in the management of ureteral stones in prepubertal children: is there a need for any ureteral dilatation?

Authors:  Canan Kocaoglu; Keramettin Ugur Ozkan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Minimally invasive management of the calcified ureteral stent.

Authors:  K C Shandera
Journal:  Tech Urol       Date:  1997

5.  Factors affecting the fate of prolonged forgotten 'J' stents.

Authors:  E O Kehinde; K A Al-Awadi; A Tawheed; A Al-Hunayan; Y Ali; A H Mahmoud
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001-06

6.  Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases.

Authors:  J W Segura; D E Patterson; A J LeRoy; H J Williams; D M Barrett; R C Benson; G R May; C E Bender
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Management of encrusted ureteral stents impacted in upper tract.

Authors:  Matthew F Bultitude; Richard C Tiptaft; Jonathan M Glass; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Use of a Holmium laser to treat a forgotten double-J stent with whole stent encrustations: a case report.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Tsai; Jung-Tsung Shen; Shu-Pin Huang; Shu-Fang Chang; Li-Jien Tsai; Wen-Jeng Wu; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Tips and tricks for the management of retained ureteral stents.

Authors:  John S Lam; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 10.  Encrusted urinary stents: evaluation and endourologic management.

Authors:  Brian A Vanderbrink; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Michael C Ost; Arthur D Smith
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  2 in total

1.  Removal of an encrusted ureteral stent by cutting the stent with a holmium laser using 4.5-Fr semi-rigid and flexible ureteroscopes.

Authors:  Satoshi Imai; Takaaki Inoue; Mototsugu Muramaki; Yuji Yamada; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-01

2.  The "Tri-Glide" Technique: A Case Report on a Novel Intraoperative Approach for Removal of Retained and Encrusted Ureteral Stents.

Authors:  Alejandra Perez; Adam Carl Nolte; Giuseppe Maurici; Alexander Charles Small; Spencer Steve Liem; Jorge Francisco Pereira; Alan Scott Polackwich; Rafael Yanes; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2022-02-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.