Literature DB >> 13916462

Response latency as a function of amount of reinforcement.

W C STEBBINS.   

Abstract

Food-deprived rats were trained to press and hold down a telegraph key in the presence of a light. Subsequent release of the key during a tone was followed by 0.15 ml of a 20-percent sucrose solution as reinforcement. The Ss were subsequently shifted to a 0-percent and to a 5-percent solution from the 20-percent base line. The median RT and the variability of RT increased markedly as a result of the shift to the lower sucrose concentrations. For all Ss, the change in median and variability was greater for the shift to the 0-percent solution than for the shift to the 5-percent solution. It is probable that median RT and variability of RT are inversely related to amount of reinforcement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LEARNING

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1962        PMID: 13916462      PMCID: PMC1404105          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  Response latency as a function of reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  W C STEBBINS; R N LANSON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The relation of amount of reinforcement to performance under a fixed-in-terval schedule.

Authors:  W C STEBBINS; P B MEAD; J M MARTIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relation of amount of primary reinforcement to discrimination and to secondary reinforcement strength.

Authors:  W C STEBBINS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-12

4.  A technique for measuring the latency of a discriminative operant.

Authors:  W C Stebbins; R N Lanson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  REACTION TIME AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS INTENSITY FOR THE MONKEY.

Authors:  W C STEBBINS; J M MILLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  NOTE OF CHANGES IN RESPONSE LATENCY FOLLOWING DISCRIMINATION TRAINING IN THE MONKEY.

Authors:  W C STEBBINS; R W REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Variation and selection: The evolutionary analogy and the convergence of cognitive and behavioral psychology.

Authors:  D L Morgan; R K Morgan; J M Toth
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1992

4.  Aging and intraindividual variability in performance: analyses of response time distributions.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Shannon Robertson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Two-factor theory, the actor-critic model, and conditioned avoidance.

Authors:  Tiago V Maia
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test (rPVT): A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice.

Authors:  Catherine M Davis; Peter G Roma; Robert D Hienz
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey.

Authors:  W C Stebbins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; M P Layng; G Badger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reaction times of younger and older men: effects of compound samples and a prechoice signal on delayed matching-to-sample performances.

Authors:  A Baron; S R Menich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reaction times of younger and older men and temporal contingencies of reinforcement.

Authors:  A Baron; S R Menich; M Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.