Literature DB >> 4043273

Simple cells in cat striate cortex: responses to stationary flashing and to moving light bars.

R M Camarda, E Peterhans, P O Bishop.   

Abstract

Cells in the simple family respond to a moving light bar with an average response histogram that is most commonly unimodal (single peak: encounter frequency, 64%) and less commonly bimodal (33%) or trimodal (3%). The mean width of the principal response peak given by hypercomplex I cells is narrower than that of simple cells and they have a lower mean optimal stimulus velocity. In a series of 74 cells (simple, 47; hypercomplex I, 27), detailed comparison of the spatial relations between the response peaks to the moving bar and the subregions to the stationary flashing bar led to the concept of a boundary response. The term "boundary response" refers to an isolated response peak occurring as a moving light bar leaves an OFF subregion that is the last in the sequence of subregions traversed by the bar. The presence of a boundary response leads to an apparent discrepancy between the number of response peaks to a moving light bar and the number of ON subregions in the static-field plot. The boundary response is necessarily completely direction selective. A detailed comparison of the properties of cells as revealed by hand and quantitative methods showed a very good agreement between the two methods in respect to the assignment of cells to the simple, B- and complex cell families. There were, however, serious discrepancies in respect to the receptive field organization of cells in the simple family.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4043273     DOI: 10.1007/bf00237027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  Organization of cat striate cortex: a correlation of receptive-field properties with afferent and efferent connections.

Authors:  W Singer; F Tretter; M Cynader
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Simple and B-cells in cat striate cortex. Complementarity of responses to moving light and dark bars.

Authors:  R Maske; S Yamane; P O Bishop
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Direction selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex to moving light bars. II. Relation to moving dark bar responses.

Authors:  S Yamane; R Maske; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial organization of subregions in receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex as revealed by stationary flashing bars and moving edges.

Authors:  R M Camarda; E Peterhans; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hypercomplex and simple/complex cell classifications in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  H Kato; P O Bishop; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatial arrangements of responses by cells in the cat visual cortex to light and dark bars and edges.

Authors:  J J Kulikowski; P O Bishop; H Kato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Functional organization of neurons in cat striate cortex: variations in ocular dominance and receptive-field type with cortical laminae and location in visual field.

Authors:  N Berman; B R Payne; D R Labar; E H Murphy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.714

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dirk Jancke; Wolfram Erlhagen; Gregor Schöner; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A nonlinear model of the behavior of simple cells in visual cortex.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Effect of degree of uniformity on predicted visual cortical response tuning curves.

Authors:  M Almon; H Spitzer
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  The RF-cinematogram. A cross-correlation technique for mapping several visual receptive fields at once.

Authors:  R Eckhorn; F Krause; J I Nelson
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Are simple striate cells analysers of visual signals both in spatial position as well as in spatial frequency?

Authors:  R M Camarda
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1984-09

6.  Spatial organization of subregions in receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex as revealed by stationary flashing bars and moving edges.

Authors:  R M Camarda; E Peterhans; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Mechanism underlying the inhibitory sidebands in the receptive field of simple striate cells of the cat: pure on/off antagonism only or true inhibition?

Authors:  R S Camarda
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1985-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.