Literature DB >> 3979495

Direction selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex to moving light bars. II. Relation to moving dark bar responses.

S Yamane, R Maske, P O Bishop.   

Abstract

The response properties of 84 simple striate cells in anaesthetized (N2O/O2 supplemented with sodium pentobarbital) and paralyzed cats were examined quantitatively using narrow optimally-oriented light and dark bars moving at optimal velocities. Different cells gave two to five spatially-offset response peaks, the light bar and the dark bar response peaks alternating with one another. With only 5 exceptions, the cells had the same preferred direction for movement of the dark bar as for the light bar. Static-field plots were prepared from 32 of the 84 cells using stationary flashing bars. The receptive fields of different cells had from two to four subregions responding either at light on (ON subregion) or at light off (OFF subregion) although one cell had only a single subregion. In the preferred direction of stimulus movement cells gave either the same number of response peaks to moving bars as there were subregions or one additional response peak. The additional response peak, termed a boundary response, always occurred at the end of the sequence of response peaks and was always completely direction selective. The direction selectivities of the individual response peaks in the responses from 49 of the 84 cells were analyzed. To ensure that each response peak and the corresponding peak in the opposite direction both came from the same subregion, the 49 cells were selected on the basis of having a response in the nonpreferred direction sufficient for analysis and of having a stimulus velocity less than 2.5 degrees/s so as to avoid significant spatial shifts of the peaks due to response latencies. For all but two of the 49 cells, the response peaks in any given profile always showed a progressively greater degree of direction selectivity as the stimulus advanced from one subregion to the next, the first subregion giving the least directionally-selective response peak and the last subregion the most directionally-selective peak. This observation was independent of the direction of stimulus motion and of the particular sequence in which the ON and the OFF subregions were traversed by the stimulus. The response patterns observed experimentally have been correlated with theoretical response patterns based on the responses of lateral geniculate neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3979495     DOI: 10.1007/bf00237839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Direction selectivity of simple striate cells: properties and mechanism.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; G H Henry; P O Bishop
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Receptive field analysis: responses to moving visual contours by single lateral geniculate neurones in the cat.

Authors:  B Dreher; K J Sanderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Responses to visual contours: spatio-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones.

Authors:  P O Bishop; J S Coombs; G H Henry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Simple and B-cells in cat striate cortex. Complementarity of responses to moving light and dark bars.

Authors:  R Maske; S Yamane; P O Bishop
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Direction selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex to moving light bars. I. Relation to stationary flashing bar and moving edge responses.

Authors:  E Peterhans; P O Bishop; R M Camarda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields.

Authors:  P H Schiller; B L Finlay; S F Volman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  L A Palmer; T L Davis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Light and dark bars; contrast discrimination.

Authors:  G E Legge; D Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Hypercomplex and simple/complex cell classifications in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  H Kato; P O Bishop; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in the cat visual cortex.

Authors:  J J Kulikowski; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  9 in total

1.  Development of response timing and direction selectivity in cat visual thalamus and cortex.

Authors:  Alan B Saul; Jordan C Feidler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Subtraction inhibition combined with a spiking threshold accounts for cortical direction selectivity.

Authors:  R Maex; G A Orban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Areal influences on complex cells in cat striate cortex: stimulus-specificity of width and length summation.

Authors:  P Hammond; I M Munden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interactions of visual stimuli in the receptive fields of inferior temporal neurons in awake macaques.

Authors:  T Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex.

Authors:  R C Reid; R E Soodak; R M Shapley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The velocity dependence of direction selectivity of visual cortical neurones in the cat.

Authors:  J Duysens; H Maes; G A Orban
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Direction selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex to moving light bars. I. Relation to stationary flashing bar and moving edge responses.

Authors:  E Peterhans; P O Bishop; R M Camarda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Simple cells in cat striate cortex: responses to stationary flashing and to moving light bars.

Authors:  R M Camarda; E Peterhans; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatial organization of subregions in receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex as revealed by stationary flashing bars and moving edges.

Authors:  R M Camarda; E Peterhans; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.