Literature DB >> 4041729

Immediate resection in emergency large bowel surgery: a 7 year audit.

N M Koruth, D C Hunter, Z H Krukowski, N A Matheson.   

Abstract

In a consecutive series of 153 emergency admissions with large bowel disease during a 7 year period, 49 per cent were for colonic obstruction, 46 per cent for peritonitis and 5 per cent for miscellaneous conditions. Urgent operation was performed on 104 (68 per cent) patients. Of those operated upon, 82 (79 per cent) had a primary resection with a mortality rate of 12.2 per cent, intraperitoneal sepsis rate of 2.4 per cent and wound sepsis rate of 7.3 per cent. The median postoperative hospital stay was 21 days. An immediate anastomosis was performed in 46 (56 per cent) patients with a mortality rate of 8.7 per cent, anastomotic leak rate of 2.2 per cent, and wound sepsis rate of 8.7 per cent. The median postoperative hospital stay was 19 days. The mortality in patients presenting with large bowel emergencies is related to age and advanced malignant disease. Immediate resection is applicable in over 80 per cent of patients requiring urgent operation and morbidity can be low and treatment economical. Immediate anastomosis after proximal colonic resection is safe and the use of intra-operative colonic irrigation permits a primary anastomosis in selected patients after emergency resection of the distal colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4041729     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

1.  Which surgeons avoid a stoma in treating left-sided colonic obstruction? Results of a postal questionnaire.

Authors:  N J Carty; A P Corder
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Current outcomes of emergency large bowel surgery.

Authors:  H J Ng; M Yule; M Twoon; N R Binnie; E H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Exteriorized colonic anastomosis.

Authors:  M Alonso Cohen; M J Galera; G Reyes; E Batista; L Allende; J Serra; J López-Gibert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Management of perforated diverticular disease.

Authors:  A Senapati; C G Marks
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Stones, lithotripters, trials, and arguments.

Authors:  H A Dudley
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-29

6.  Postoperative colonic decompression: eight years' experience of a new technique.

Authors:  J W Rickett; F Parivar; J E Benfield
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Raising a colostomy--results of a prospective surgical audit.

Authors:  R J Aitken; P J Stevens; N du Preez; M S Elliot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Transcaecal ileal diversion in the management of the 'at risk' distal colonic anastomosis.

Authors:  M C Winslet; P Cooke; M L Obeid
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann's procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon.

Authors:  N Regenet; P Pessaux; S Hennekinne; E Lermite; J J Tuech; O Brehant; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Physical status is the principal determinant of outcome after emergency admission of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R D Kingston; S H Walsh; J Jeacock
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.