Literature DB >> 8215150

Physical status is the principal determinant of outcome after emergency admission of patients with colorectal cancer.

R D Kingston1, S H Walsh, J Jeacock.   

Abstract

A prospective study of 825 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer presenting to three general surgeons in a district general hospital over a 10-year period are reported. In all, 735 patients had an operation and are grouped according to whether their operation was within 24 h of admission (n = 63), more than 24 h after admission (n = 151), or elective (n = 521). Operative mortalities for these groups were 15.9%, 15.2% and 6.5%, respectively, significantly higher in both the emergency groups. Delayed surgery to allow complete resuscitation did not improve the operative mortality when compared with those patients having urgent surgery. Both groups of emergency patients, delayed (27%) urgent (19%), showed poorer 5-year survival than the electively treated patients (36%), many dying of non-cancer causes. Patients who undergo emergency surgery for colorectal carcinoma are more likely to be in poorer physical condition than patients undergoing elective surgery for the same condition. It appears that the physical status is the principal determinant of outcome after emergency colorectal surgery rather than any other factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8215150      PMCID: PMC2497987     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of two prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic regimes in the treatment of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a district general hospital.

Authors:  R D Kingston; R S Kiff; J S Duthie; S Walsh; A Spicer; J Jeacock
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1989-08

2.  Emergency presentation and mortality from colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  R P Waldron; I A Donovan; J Drumm; S N Mottram; S Tedman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Immediate resection in emergency large bowel surgery: a 7 year audit.

Authors:  N M Koruth; D C Hunter; Z H Krukowski; N A Matheson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Management variability in surgery for colorectal emergencies.

Authors:  C R Darby; A R Berry; N Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Elective and emergency surgery for colorectal cancer in a district general hospital: impact of surgical training on patient survival.

Authors:  J Chester; D Britton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Large-bowel obstruction caused by cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  L P Fielding; S Stewart-Brown; L Blesovsky
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-09-01

7.  Surgical results in 657 patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M J Turunen; P Peltokallio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.585

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Efficacy of metronidazole lavage in treatment of intraperitoneal sepsis. A prospective study.

Authors:  S K Saha
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The effect of obstruction and perforation on colorectal cancer disease-free survival.

Authors:  Yik-Hong Ho; Simon K K Siu; Petra Buttner; Andrew Stevenson; John Lumley; Russel Stitz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Determinants of emergency presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Allan M Golder; Donald C McMillan; Paul G Horgan; Campbell S D Roxburgh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.