Literature DB >> 3598319

Raising a colostomy--results of a prospective surgical audit.

R J Aitken, P J Stevens, N du Preez, M S Elliot.   

Abstract

A prospective surgical audit of all colostomies fashioned over a 1-year period in one hospital was conducted. Of one hundred and ten colostomies there were 56 loop and 52 end stomas. Following the formation of the colostomy a proforma was completed and the surgeon interviewed to document the precise surgical technique employed. Whilst in hospital the patients were regularly reviewed and the colostomies assessed by a surgeon and stomatherapist using a scoring system. Follow up was continued until closure of the colostomy or for a minimum period of 1 year. Only 53 (48%) of patients saw a stomatherapist preoperatively. This rate was higher in elective (86%) than in urgent cases (15%). The surgial technique used did not appear to influence the outcome of any given colostomy. However, failure to cruciate the posterior rectus sheath may predispose to stomal stenosis and the use of a subcutaneous polyethylene rod to support a loop colostomy often led to infection. Tension of the colostomy led to complications in 29 cases (26%), this was often the precipitating event to other complications and led to the only colostomy-related death. Registrars with experience of fewer than 5 colostomies received their training largely from other registrars rather than consultants. This prospective surgical audit has disclosed that fashioning a colostomy carries significant stoma related morbidity, most of which is potentially avoidable. Appropriate audit can contribute to the maintenance and improvement of surgical standards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3598319     DOI: 10.1007/bf01648346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Colostomy: the consequences of surgery.

Authors:  A Eardley; W D George; F Davis; P F Schofield; M C Wilson; J Wakefield; R A Sellwood
Journal:  Clin Oncol       Date:  1976-09

2.  The temporary colostomy.

Authors:  D M Dent; P J Stevens
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1976-05-15

3.  Colostomy: a new look at morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  B L Abrams; F H Alsikafi; N G Waterman
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Complications of colostomy.

Authors:  F J Burns
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Subcutaneous colostomy rod.

Authors:  J W Rickett
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-08-23

6.  Aftermath of surgery for anorectal cancer.

Authors:  H B Devlin; J A Plant; M Griffin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-08-14

7.  Immediate resection in emergency large bowel surgery: a 7 year audit.

Authors:  N M Koruth; D C Hunter; Z H Krukowski; N A Matheson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  The morbidity and cost of the temporary colostomy.

Authors:  R Smit; A J Walt
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Colostomies and their complications.

Authors:  E W Green
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1966-06
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Outcomes of support rod usage in loop stoma formation.

Authors:  Ian Whiteley; Michael Russell; Natasha Nassar; Marc A Gladman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The rectus sling to prevent loop colostomy retraction: a case series.

Authors:  Gary Atkin; Mike A Scott; Pawan Mathur; Ian C Mitchell
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.