Literature DB >> 4033398

Mechanical and physiological responses to lower extremity loading during running.

P E Martin.   

Abstract

Fifteen highly trained men performed treadmill running at 12 km X h-1 to determine the effect of lower extremity loading on measures for seven temporal and kinematic descriptors of the running cycle, the mechanical work done on the lower extremity, oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate. Five load conditions (no added load and loads of 0.50 kg and 1.00 kg added to either the thighs or feet) were examined. The results demonstrated that VO2 and heart rate increased as load was increased on both the thighs and feet. All changes were statistically significant except for the heart rate changes due to thigh loading. The increases in VO2 due to foot loading--approximately 7.2% per kg of load--were nearly twice as great as those due to thigh loading. The results also demonstrated that 1.00 kg added to the feet produced small but significant increases in stride length (1.4 cm), swing time (9 ms), and flight time (6 ms) and a decrease in peak ankle velocity (0.23 m X s-1). No other load condition resulted in significant changes in any of the temporal and kinematic variables. The results for mechanical work demonstrated that significant increases in the work done on the leg were produced by the loading but that these increases were limited to the loaded segments. Consistent with the data for oxygen consumption and heart rate, mechanical work was increased to a greater extent by foot loading than by thigh loading. It was concluded from these results that the increased physiological demand was directly related to the mechanical work increases, which in turn were attributed to the increased inertia of the loaded segments rather than modifications in the kinematics of the lower extremity movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4033398     DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198508000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  21 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners.

Authors:  Philo U Saunders; David B Pyne; Richard D Telford; John A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Differences in morphology and force/velocity relationship between Senegalese and Italian sprinters.

Authors:  Abderrehmane Rahmani; Elio Locatelli; Jean-Rene Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Mechanical efficiency of limb swing during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).

Authors:  Jonas Rubenson; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-02-19

4.  Constraint-led changes in internal variability in running.

Authors:  Anita Haudum; Jürgen Birklbauer; Josef Kröll; Erich Müller
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Short-term changes in 10-km race pace aerobic demand and gait mechanics following a bout of high-intensity distance running.

Authors:  D W Morgan; H S Strohmeyer; J T Daniels; C C Beaudoin; M W Craib; R A Borden; P J Greer; C L Burleson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

Review 6.  How Biomechanical Improvements in Running Economy Could Break the 2-hour Marathon Barrier.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram; Christopher J Arellano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  The impact of firefighter personal protective equipment and treadmill protocol on maximal oxygen uptake.

Authors:  Joo-Young Lee; Ilham Bakri; Jung-Hyun Kim; Su-Young Son; Yutaka Tochihara
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 8.  The Effects of Wearable Resistance Training on Metabolic, Kinematic and Kinetic Variables During Walking, Running, Sprint Running and Jumping: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paul Macadam; John B Cronin; Kim D Simperingham
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Added lower limb mass does not affect biomechanical asymmetry but increases metabolic power in runners with a unilateral transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Ryan S Alcantara; Owen N Beck; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Physiological strain due to load carrying in heavy footwear.

Authors:  M Holewijn; R Heus; L J Wammes
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.