Literature DB >> 4031769

The role of compliance in mammalian running gaits.

T A McMahon.   

Abstract

The running gaits used by both bipedal and quadrupedal animals are reviewed and contrasted. At high speeds, bipeds use both ordinary running, in which the legs move opposite one another, and hopping. Quadrupeds generally use the trot or its variations at moderate speeds, and first the canter and then the gallop as speed increases. Running in both bipeds and quadrupeds generally involves at least one aerial phase per stride cycle, but certain perturbations to running including running in circles, running under enhanced gravity, running on compliant surfaces and running with increased knee flexion (Groucho running) can reduce the aerial phase, even to zero. A conceptual model of running based on the idea that an animal rebounds from the ground like a resonant mass-spring system may be used to compare the various gaits. The model makes specific predictions which show that galloping is generally faster than cantering, pronking or trotting, and requires lower peak vertical forces on the legs while also giving a smoother ride. Even so, trotting might be preferred to galloping at low and moderate speeds for the same reason that normal running is preferred to Groucho running-the more compliant gait offers a smoother ride and lower vertical ground-reaction forces on the feet, but this can only be obtained at a high cost of increased metabolic power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4031769     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.115.1.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  19 in total

1.  Gait selection in the ostrich: mechanical and metabolic characteristics of walking and running with and without an aerial phase.

Authors:  Jonas Rubenson; Denham B Heliams; David G Lloyd; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Directionally compliant legs influence the intrinsic pitch behaviour of a trotting quadruped.

Authors:  David V Lee; Sanford G Meek
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Running stability is enhanced by a proximo-distal gradient in joint neuromechanical control.

Authors:  M A Daley; G Felix; A A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Adaptational phenomena and mechanical responses during running: effect of surface, aging and task experience.

Authors:  Kiros Karamanidis; Adamantios Arampatzis; Gert-Peter Brüggemann
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  When does a gait transition occur during human locomotion?

Authors:  Alan Hreljac; Rodney T Imamura; Rafael F Escamilla; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Athletic footwear, leg stiffness, and running kinematics.

Authors:  Mark Bishop; Paul Fiolkowski; Bryan Conrad; Denis Brunt; MaryBeth Horodyski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  A stability-based mechanism for hysteresis in the walk-trot transition in quadruped locomotion.

Authors:  Shinya Aoi; Daiki Katayama; Soichiro Fujiki; Nozomi Tomita; Tetsuro Funato; Tsuyoshi Yamashita; Kei Senda; Kazuo Tsuchiya
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Preferred and energetically optimal transition speeds during backward human locomotion.

Authors:  Alan Hreljac; Rodney Imamura; Rafael F Escamilla; Jeffrey Casebolt; Mitell Sison
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Muscle proprioceptors in adult rat: mechanosensory signaling and synapse distribution in spinal cord.

Authors:  Jacob A Vincent; Hanna M Gabriel; Adam S Deardorff; Paul Nardelli; Robert E W Fyffe; Thomas Burkholder; Timothy C Cope
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability.

Authors:  Monica A Daley; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.