Literature DB >> 15817430

Directionally compliant legs influence the intrinsic pitch behaviour of a trotting quadruped.

David V Lee1, Sanford G Meek.   

Abstract

Limb design is well conserved among quadrupeds, notably, the knees point forward (i.e. cranial inclination of femora) and the elbows point back (i.e. caudal inclination of humeri). This study was undertaken to examine the effects of joint orientation on individual leg forces and centre of mass dynamics. Steady-speed trotting was simulated in two quadrupedal models. Model I had the knee and elbow orientation of a quadruped and model II had a reversed leg configuration in which knees point back and elbows point forward. The model's legs showed directional compliance determined by the orientation of the knee/elbow. In both models, forward pointing knees/elbows produced a propulsive force bias, while rearward pointing knees/elbows produced a braking force bias. Hence, model I showed the same pattern of hind-leg propulsion and fore-leg braking observed in trotting animals. Simulations revealed minimal pitch oscillations during steady-speed trotting of model I, but substantially greater and more irregular pitch oscillations of model II. The reduced pitch oscillation of model I was a result of fore-leg and hind-leg forces that reduced pitching moments during early and late stance, respectively. This passive mechanism for reducing pitch oscillations was an emergent property of directionally compliant legs with the fore-hind configuration of model I. Such intrinsic stability resulting from mechanical design can simplify control tasks and lead to more robust running machines.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15817430      PMCID: PMC1564074          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Joint stiffness of the ankle and the knee in running.

Authors:  Michael Günther; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Swing-leg retraction: a simple control model for stable running.

Authors:  André Seyfarth; Hartmut Geyer; Hugh Herr
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Effects of mass distribution on the mechanics of level trotting in dogs.

Authors:  David V Lee; Eric F Stakebake; Rebecca M Walter; David R Carrier
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed?

Authors:  T A McMahon; G C Cheng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The spring-mass model for running and hopping.

Authors:  R Blickhan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  A model of scale effects in mammalian quadrupedal running.

Authors:  Hugh M Herr; Gregory T Huang; Thomas A McMahon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Dynamic and static stability in hexapedal runners.

Authors:  L H Ting; R Blickhan; R J Full
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  The role of compliance in mammalian running gaits.

Authors:  T A McMahon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Running springs: speed and animal size.

Authors:  C T Farley; J Glasheen; T A McMahon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Dynamic gearing in running dogs.

Authors:  D R Carrier; C S Gregersen; N A Silverton
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Olympic motto through the lens of equestrian sports.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Hobbs; Hilary M Clayton
Journal:  Anim Front       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Genetic regulation of canine skeletal traits: trade-offs between the hind limbs and forelimbs in the fox and dog.

Authors:  Anastasia V Kharlamova; Lyudmila N Trut; David R Carrier; Kevin Chase; Karl G Lark
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  Stability and Control of a Pacing Quadruped Using Stabilizing Switching Design.

Authors:  Eric W McClain; Ali Samare Filsoofi; Sanford Meek
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2021-09-02

4.  An extension to the collisional model of the energetic cost of support qualitatively explains trotting and the trot-canter transition.

Authors:  James R Usherwood
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2019-04-29

5.  Limb work and joint work minimization reveal an energetic benefit to the elbows-back, knees-forward limb design in parasagittal quadrupeds.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Michael C Granatosky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.