Literature DB >> 24501559

Preferred and energetically optimal transition speeds during backward human locomotion.

Alan Hreljac1, Rodney Imamura1, Rafael F Escamilla1, Jeffrey Casebolt1, Mitell Sison1.   

Abstract

Some aspects of backward locomotion are similar to forward locomotion, while other aspects are not related to their forward counterpart. The backward preferred transition speed (BPTS) has never been directly compared to the energetically optimal transition speed (EOTS), nor has it been compared to the preferred transition speed (PTS) during forward locomotion. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the BPTS occurs at the EOTS, and to examine the relationship between the backward and forward preferred gait transition speeds. The preferred backward and forward transition speeds of 12 healthy, young subjects (7 males, 5 females) were determined after subjects were familiarized with forward and backward treadmill locomotion. On a subsequent day, subjects walked backward at speeds of 70, 80, 90, 100, and 110% of the BPTS and ran backward at speeds of 60, 75, 90, 100, and 120% of the BPTS while VO2 and RPE data were collected. After subtracting standing VO2, exercise VO2 was normalized to body mass and speed. For each subject, energy-speed curves for walking and running were fit to the normalized data points. The intersection of these curves was defined as the EOTS which was compared to the BPTS using a paired t-test (p < 0.05). RPE and VO2 at the BPTS were also compared between walking and running conditions, and the correlation between BPTS and PTS was calculated. The EOTS (1.85 ± 0.09 m·s(-1)) was significantly greater than the BPTS (1.63 ± 0.11 m·s(-1)). Even though RPE was equal for walking and running at the BPTS, VO2 was significantly greater when running. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.82) between the BPTS and the PTS. Similar to forward locomotion, the determinants of the BPTS must include factors other than metabolic energy. The gait transition during backward locomotion exhibits several similarities to its forward counterpart. Key PointsThe backward preferred transition speed (1.63 ± 0.11 m·s(-1)) was significantly less than the energetically optimal transition speed (1.85 ± 0.09 m·s(-1)), similar to what is observed during forward locomotion.RPE was equal for walking and running at the backward preferred transition speed.There was a strong correlation (r = 0.82) between the backward and forward preferred transition speeds.Similar to forward locomotion, the determinants of the BPTS must include factors other than metabolic energy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Running; gait transition; preferred transition speed; walking

Year:  2005        PMID: 24501559      PMCID: PMC3899661     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  39 in total

1.  Lower extremity joint kinetics and energetics during backward running.

Authors:  P DeVita; J Stribling
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  The determinants of the step frequency in walking in humans.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; P Franzetti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  [A theoretical model of the transition phase in human locomotion].

Authors:  A Beuter; R Lefebvre
Journal:  Can J Sport Sci       Date:  1988-12

4.  How is the normal locomotor program modified to produce backward walking?

Authors:  A Thorstensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Determinants of the gait transition speed during human locomotion: kinematic factors.

Authors:  A Hreljac
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion.

Authors:  A Hreljac
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  The adaptation to speed in human locomotion.

Authors:  S Grillner; J Halbertsma; J Nilsson; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Predicting oxygen uptake during counterclockwise arm crank ergometry in men with lower limb disabilities.

Authors:  W E Langbein; K C Maki
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Speed, stride frequency and energy cost per stride: how do they change with body size and gait?

Authors:  N C Heglund; C R Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Bone strain: a determinant of gait and speed?

Authors:  A A Biewener; C R Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed.

Authors:  Betty J Mohler; William B Thompson; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Herbert L Pick; William H Warren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Does Falls Efficacy Influence the Relationship Between Forward and Backward Walking Speed After Stroke?

Authors:  Kanika Bansal; David J Clark; Emily J Fox; Dorian K Rose
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-05-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.