Literature DB >> 4030799

Kinematic features of wheelchair propulsion.

D J Sanderson, H J Sommer.   

Abstract

Three male paraplegics volunteered to push their wheelchairs on a motor driven treadmill, for a total of 80 min each, at a work rate of 60-65% of their VO2 maximum, determined on an earlier test session. At 20 min intervals 16 mm high-speed film of the subjects was taken for three consecutive push cycles. The digitized film was used to compute the angular kinematics of the shoulder and elbow joints, the variations in the position of the trunk (as measured by a marker on the neck) and hand relative to the axle of the rear wheel. There were no intrasubject variations over the 80 min testing period for any of the recorded variables. This was interpreted as implying that at that work rate, fatigue was not exhibited as variations in the kinematics of movement. There were considerable differences between the style of one subject when compared to the other two over all the trials of each subject. This variation in style was most obvious in subject number PT who had a pumping style of push and recovery whereas subjects CA and GW employed a more continuous circular motion. The differences in the amount of forward lean of each subject were related to residual muscle strength. The discussion centered on the influence of the different styles on performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4030799     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90277-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

Review 1.  Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports.

Authors:  Y Vanlandewijck; D Theisen; D Daly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Computer-controlled wheelchair ergometer.

Authors:  R Niesing; F Eijskoot; R Kranse; A H den Ouden; J Storm; H E Veeger; L H van der Woude; C J Snijders
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Physiological and biomechanical differences between wheelchair-dependent and able-bodied subjects during wheelchair ergometry.

Authors:  D D Brown; R G Knowlton; J Hamill; T L Schneider; R K Hetzler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

4.  Shoulder pain and jerk during recovery phase of manual wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Chandrasekaran Jayaraman; Carolyn L Beck; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The physiological and biomechanical effects of forwards and reverse sports wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Barry S Mason; John P Lenton; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Optimum cycle frequencies in hand-rim wheelchair propulsion. Wheelchair propulsion technique.

Authors:  L H van der Woude; H E Veeger; R H Rozendal; A J Sargeant
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

7.  Effect of choice of recovery patterns on handrim kinetics in manual wheelchair users with paraplegia and tetraplegia.

Authors:  Shashank Raina; Jill McNitt-Gray; Sara Mulroy; Philip Requejo
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Biomechanic evaluation of upper-extremity symmetry during manual wheelchair propulsion over varied terrain.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Melissa M Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Shoulder demands in manual wheelchair users across a spectrum of activities.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Wendy J Hurd; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Evidence-Based Strategies for Preserving Mobility for Elderly and Aging Manual Wheelchair Users.

Authors:  Philip S Requejo; Jan Furumasu; Sara J Mulroy
Journal:  Top Geriatr Rehabil       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.