Literature DB >> 4020449

Cervical facetectomy and its effect on spine strength.

R B Raynor, J Pugh, I Shapiro.   

Abstract

Fourteen cervical spine motion segments consisting of two adjacent vertebral bodies and their connecting ligaments were tested in shear. Five had intact facet joints, five had bilateral facetectomy of 50% or less, and four had bilateral 70% facetectomy. Three to 5 mm of root could be exposed in the specimens with 50% facetectomy, and 8 to 10 mm in those with 70% facetectomy. Anterior-posterior shear tests were run alternately in compression and distraction. Facetectomy was found to have no effect on compression and distraction stiffness. Failure in the 70% facetectomized specimens was due to fracture of the remaining joint at 159 lbs. In the specimens with 50% facetectomy, a fracture load could not be established since failure of the specimen mounting occurred at 208 lbs, as it did in two of the specimens without facetectomy that were tested to failure. The difference in bone fracture at 159 lbs and mounting failure at 208 lbs is significant at p less than 0.05. Bilateral resection of more than 50% of the facet joint significantly compromises the shear strength of a cervical spine motion segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4020449     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1985.63.2.0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  24 in total

1.  Anatomical study of the cervical nerve roots for posterior foraminotomy: cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mohamed Barakat; Youssef Hussein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Morphometric study of the nerve roots around the lateral mass for posterior foraminotomy.

Authors:  Jae-Chan Hwang; Hak-Geun Bae; Sung-Won Cho; Sung-Jin Cho; Hyung-Ki Park; Jae-Chil Chang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-05-31

3.  Clinical results of the foraminotomy as described by Frykholm for the treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  W Krupp; H Schattke; R Müke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Modified transcorporeal anterior cervical microforaminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: a technical note and early results.

Authors:  Gun Choi; Sang-Ho Lee; Arun Bhanot; Yu Sik Chae; Byungjoo Jung; Seungcheol Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical comparison of laminectomy, hemilaminectomy and a new minimally invasive approach in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical intradural tumour: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Tianhao Xie; Jun Qian; Yicheng Lu; Bo Chen; Yikun Jiang; Chun Luo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Role of posterior elements in the disc bulging of a degenerated cervical spine.

Authors:  Farid Amirouche; Giovanni F Solitro; Kris Siemionow; David Drucker; Ashish Upadhyay; Priyesh Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-02

7.  [Biomechanical changes of sheep cervical spine after unilateral hemilaminectomy and different degrees of facetectomy].

Authors:  C Wu; Z Y Wang; G Z Lin; T Yu; B Liu; Y Si; Y B Zhang; Y C Li
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

Review 8.  Pediatric iatrogenic thoracic kyphosis and tension myelopathy treated with a thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mina G Safain; Rachel B Engelberg; Ron Riesenburger; James Kryzanski; Andrew Jea; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Evaluation of the influence of pedicle-lengthening osteotomy on lumbar stability.

Authors:  Maofeng Gao; Jun Zou; Zhigang Zhang; Zongping Luo; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

10.  Evaluation of effectiveness of a facet wiring technique: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  V K Goel; C R Clark; K G Harris; Y E Kim; K R Schulte
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.