Literature DB >> 26056628

Role of posterior elements in the disc bulging of a degenerated cervical spine.

Farid Amirouche1, Giovanni F Solitro1, Kris Siemionow1, David Drucker1, Ashish Upadhyay1, Priyesh Patel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies have been developed to characterize the mechanical behavior of the intervertebral disc specifically for the lumbar spine and there have been limited studies done on the cervical spine with the goal to evaluate the strength of the cervical spine under compression without any information on the bulging of the intervertebral discs. The goal of the current study is to examine the deformation response of the cervical intervertebral disc classified with grade III or greater degeneration and analyze the relationship between axial deformation and anterior and posterior bulge under compression up to 550 N.
METHODS: Each specimen was compressed for 3 cycles to a maximum load of 550N in steps of 50 N. The bulge was measured using Linear Variable Differential Transformers (LVDTs on an intact spinal segment, spinal segment with post laminectomy, and spinal segment post facetectomy.
RESULTS: The anterior budge for an intact spinal segment shows a change of slope at loads of 262N±66N. For a physiological load of 250N the vertical displacement or spine segment height was reduced by 10.1% for an intact segment and 8.78% for the laminectomy and facetectomy configurations with F = 0.159 (Fcrit = 3.89) with no statistical difference observed. For the post laminectomy there was a decrease of 35% in anterior bulge compared to the intact specimen.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that for grade III disc degeneration the cervical segments bulging for both the laminectomy and facetectomy procedures are not significantly different. In post laminectomy the average anterior and posterior bulges are similar to the average anterior and posterior bulge post facetectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulging; Cervical Spine; Facetectomy; Laminectomy; disc degeneration

Year:  2015        PMID: 26056628      PMCID: PMC4442629          DOI: 10.14444/2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  23 in total

1.  Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; R M Havey; A J Ghanayem; H Diener; K P Meade; B Dunlap; S D Hodges
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics.

Authors:  T Zander; A Rohlmann; C Klöckner; G Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The relation between intervertebral disc bulging and annular fiber associated strains for simple and complex loading.

Authors:  Frank Heuer; Hendrik Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments.

Authors:  S P Moroney; A B Schultz; J A Miller; G B Andersson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Current techniques in the management of cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  Carter S Gerard; John E O'Toole
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 6.  The epidemiology of neck pain.

Authors:  D G Hoy; M Protani; R De; R Buchbinder
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.098

7.  The role of the lumbar facet joints in spinal stability. Identification of alternative paths of loading.

Authors:  T R Haher; M O'Brien; J W Dryer; R Nucci; R Zipnick; D J Leone
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Anatomical gender differences in cervical vertebrae of size-matched volunteers.

Authors:  Brian D Stemper; Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar; Dennis J Maiman; Mark A Meyer; John DeRosia; Barry S Shender; Glenn Paskoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Which factors prognosticate spinal instability following lumbar laminectomy?

Authors:  Arno Bisschop; Barend J van Royen; Margriet G Mullender; Cornelis P L Paul; Idsart Kingma; Timothy U Jiya; Albert J van der Veen; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - an experimental study in porcine model.

Authors:  Ching-Lung Tai; Pang-Hsing Hsieh; Weng-Pin Chen; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.