Literature DB >> 3360245

Focal hepatic lesions: detection by dynamic and delayed computed tomography versus short TE/TR spin echo and fast field echo magnetic resonance imaging.

R C Nelson1, J L Chezmar, H V Steinberg, W E Torres, B R Baumgartner, R K Gedgaudas-McClees, M E Bernardino.   

Abstract

Eighteen patients with focal hepatic lesions were evaluated with two computed tomographic (CT) techniques including dynamic sequential bolus contrast CT and delayed contrast CT, and 3 magnetic resonance (MR) techniques including a spin echo pulse sequence with TE/TR of 21/310 msec and 2 fast field echo sequences using a TE/TR of 15/300 msec and 80 degrees flip angle (T1-weighted) and TE/TR of 15/500 msec and 10-20 degrees flip angle (T2-weighted). We concluded that CT, using delayed contrast and dynamic sequential bolus contrast techniques, was consistently superior to the 3 MR pulse sequences used on our imagers in terms of number of lesions detected, lesion-to-liver contrast, and quality of scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3360245     DOI: 10.1007/bf01889039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  16 in total

1.  CT densities in delayed iodine hepatic scanning.

Authors:  R B Perkerson; B C Erwin; B R Baumgartner; V M Phillips; W E Torres; J L Clements; K Gedgaudas-McClees; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Delayed iodine scanning of the liver: a promising CT technique.

Authors:  V M Phillips; B C Erwin; M E Bernardino
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses.

Authors:  L L Berland; T L Lawson; W D Foley; B L Melrose; K N Chintapalli; A J Taylor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Multiple NMR T2 relaxation values in human liver tissue.

Authors:  M E Bernardino; W Small; J Goldstein; C W Sewell; P J Sones; K Gedgaudas-McClees; J T Galambos; J Wenger; W J Casarella
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Contrast enhancement technique for dynamic hepatic computed tomographic scanning.

Authors:  W D Foley; L L Berland; T L Lawson; D F Smith; M K Thorsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Detection of hepatic metastases: analysis of pulse sequence performance in MR imaging.

Authors:  D D Stark; J Wittenberg; R R Edelman; M S Middleton; S Saini; R J Butch; T J Brady; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Hepatic metastases studied with MR and CT.

Authors:  J P Heiken; J K Lee; H S Glazer; D Ling
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MR image contrast and relaxation times of solid tumors in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

Authors:  H C Schmidt; D Tscholakoff; H Hricak; C B Higgins
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Evaluation of focal hepatic masses: a comparative study of MRI and CT.

Authors:  G M Glazer; A M Aisen; I R Francis; B H Gross; J W Gyves; W D Ensminger
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1986

10.  Hepatic tumors: magnetic resonance and CT appearance.

Authors:  A A Moss; H I Goldberg; D B Stark; P L Davis; A R Margulis; L Kaufman; L E Crooks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of focal hepatic lesions.

Authors:  J A Barakos; H I Goldberg; J J Brown; T J Gilbert
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.