Literature DB >> 4010248

Evaluation of speech production of the hearing impaired: some benefits of forced-choice testing.

A Boothroyd.   

Abstract

The speech production performance of 16 hearing-impaired subjects (thresholds 82-110 dB HL) was measured using both experienced and inexperienced listeners. Four types of measure were obtained: score on a forced-choice test requiring the production of eight segmental contrasts, recognition probability for phonemes produced in consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words, recognition probability for CVC words produced in a simple carrier phrase, and recognition probability for words produced in sentence context. The experienced listeners gave higher scores than did the inexperienced listeners, but the magnitude of the effect decreased with decreasing linguistic redundancy in the test material, falling to only 1.3 percentage points for the forced-choice test. The pattern of performance across the eight contrasts of the forced-choice test changed significantly from subject to subject. Performance on the contrast test accounted for 70% of the variance in the scores on the sentence test. The results demonstrate that forced-choice tests can be used to provide speech production measures that are virtually independent of listener experience, that provide analytic detail about an individual's production of phonetic contrasts, and that are reasonably predictive of the intelligibility of speech produced in more natural communicative settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4010248     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2802.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  12 in total

1.  Studies in pediatric hearing loss at the House Research Institute.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen C Johnson; Amy S Martinez; Leslie Visser-Dumont; Dianne Hammes Ganguly; Jennifer F Still
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Assessing toddlers' speech-sound discrimination.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Kaylah Lalonde
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds’ speech-sound discrimination: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Ginger S Stickney; Ying-Yee Kong; Michael Vongphoe; Ashish Bhargave; Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Learning to perceptually organize speech signals in native fashion.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transcribing the speech of children with cochlear implants: clinical application of narrow phonetic transcriptions.

Authors:  Amy P Teoh; Steven B Chin
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  The effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms.

Authors:  Nirmal Srinivasan; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2011-12-15

8.  Recording and evaluation of an American dialect version of the Four Alternative Auditory Feature test.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 9.  Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  An on-line imitative test of speech-pattern contrast perception (OlimSpac): developmental effects in normally hearing children.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd; Laurie S Eisenberg; Amy S Martinez
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.