Literature DB >> 4009228

Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus: different consequences of contralateral and ipsilateral auditory stimulation.

M N Semple, L M Kitzes.   

Abstract

Monaural excitatory responses of 181 single units in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of 15 anesthetized gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) were examined quantitatively. Pure-tone stimuli were presented monaurally through sealed, calibrated sound-delivery systems. Most units were excited only by contralateral stimulation (EO); 23% were bilaterally excitable (EE). The threshold frequency tuning curves for contralateral stimulation of EE units were significantly broader than those produced by ipsilateral stimulation of EE units and those produced by contralateral stimulation of EO units. The frequency at which threshold was lowest (best frequency), or BF) was very similar for ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation of individual EE units; however, ipsilateral BFs were slightly but significantly lower than contralateral BFs. For EE units, ipsilateral BF thresholds (mean: 29.2 dB SPL) were significantly higher than contralateral BF thresholds (mean: 14.9 dB SPL). Monotonic and nonmonotonic relationships between discharge rate and stimulus intensity at BF were observed in responses evoked both by contralateral and ipsilateral stimulation. Interestingly, for individual EE units it was not uncommon for the rate/intensity function for one monaural condition to be monotonic although the relationship for stimulation of the other ear was markedly nonmonotonic. There was no qualitative difference between rate/intensity functions evoked by contralateral stimulation in EO and EE units. Ipsilateral discharge rates were characteristically much lower than contralateral rates for a given stimulus intensity. For 50 BF tones of 100 ms duration, the median peak numbers of discharges for contralateral stimulation of EO and EE units were 361 and 339, respectively; the median for ipsilateral stimulation of EE units was 102. The dynamic range of each rate/intensity function was calculated by measuring the intensity range associated with an increase in spike count from 10 to 90% of the peak rate. No differences were detected between the distributions of dynamic range for contralateral stimulation in EO or EE units, or between contralateral and ipsilateral dynamic ranges within individual EE units. For all response types the distributions of dynamic range were approximately normal, with means near 20 dB. The minimum mean latency to the first spike at BF was generally longer for ipsilateral than for contralateral responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4009228     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.6.1467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Functional organization of auditory cortical fields in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus): binaural 2-deoxyglucose patterns.

Authors:  D Caird; H Scheich; R Klinke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Prevalence of stereotypical responses to mistuned complex tones in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li; David S Velenovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Synaptic mechanisms for generating temporal diversity of auditory representation in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Mu Zhou; Ya-Tang Li; Wei Yuan; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Stimulus dependence of contralateral dominance in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Iris Steinmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Dynamic Changes in Synaptic Plasticity Genes in Ipsilateral and Contralateral Inferior Colliculus Following Unilateral Noise-induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Senthilvelan Manohar; Francesca Yoshie Russo; Gail M Seigel; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Decoding sound level in the marmoset primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Wensheng Sun; Ellisha N Marongelli; Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Rate-level responses in awake marmoset auditory cortex.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The organization of frequency and binaural cues in the gerbil inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Gilberto David Graña; Kendall A Hutson; Alexandra Badea; Andrew Pappa; William Scott; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Homeostatic Control of Spontaneous Activity in the Developing Auditory System.

Authors:  Travis A Babola; Sally Li; Alexandra Gribizis; Brian J Lee; John B Issa; Han Chin Wang; Michael C Crair; Dwight E Bergles
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.