Literature DB >> 25346487

Stimulus dependence of contralateral dominance in human auditory cortex.

Alexander Gutschalk1, Iris Steinmann.   

Abstract

The auditory system is often considered to show little contralateral dominance but physiological reports on the contralateral dominance of activity evoked by monaural sound vary widely. Here, we show that part of this variation is stimulus-dependent: blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) responses to 32 s of monaurally presented unmodulated noise (UN) showed activation in contralateral auditory cortex (AC) and deactivation in ipsilateral AC compared to nonstimulus baseline. Slow amplitude-modulated (AM) noise evoked strong contralateral activation and minimal ipsilateral activation. The contrast of AM-versus-UN was used to separate fMRI activity related to the slow amplitude modulation per se. This difference activation was bilateral although still stronger in contralateral AC. In magnetoencephalography (MEG), the response was dominated by the steady-state activity phase locked to the amplitude modulation. This MEG activity showed no consistent contralateral dominance across listeners. Subcortical BOLD activation was strongly contralateral subsequent to the superior olivary complex (SOC) and showed no significant difference between modulated and UN. An acallosal participant showed similar fMRI activation as the group, ruling transcallosal transmission an unlikely source of ipsilateral enhancement or ipsilateral deactivation. These results suggest that ascending activity subsequent to the SOC is strongly dominant contralateral to the stimulus ear. In contrast, the part of BOLD and MEG activity related to slow amplitude modulation is more bilateral and only observed in AC. Ipsilateral deactivation can potentially bias measures of contralateral BOLD dominance and should be considered in future studies.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amplitude modulation; corpus callosum; fMRI; magnetoencephalography; monaural

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25346487      PMCID: PMC6868976          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  72 in total

1.  Representation of lateralization and tonotopy in primary versus secondary human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers; Walter H Backes; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Auditory selective attention modulates activation of human inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Teemu Rinne; Marja H Balk; Sonja Koistinen; Taina Autti; Kimmo Alho; Mikko Sams
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  BOLD responses in human auditory cortex are more closely related to transient MEG responses than to sustained ones.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Matti S Hämäläinen; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The silent period between sounds has a stronger effect than the interstimulus interval on auditory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  T Imada; M Watanabe; T Mashiko; M Kawakatsu; M Kotani
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01

5.  The corpus callosum and cerebral speech lateralization.

Authors:  M Lassonde; M P Bryden; P Demers
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  J C Adams
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1979-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Cortical and subcortical activation with monaural monosyllabic stimulation by functional MRI.

Authors:  Mikio Suzuki; Hiroya Kitano; Tuyoshi Kitanishi; Ryuta Itou; Akihiko Shiino; Yasuhiro Nishida; Yoshiro Yazawa; Fumio Ogawa; Kazutomo Kitajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Lateralized tinnitus studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging: abnormal inferior colliculus activation.

Authors:  J R Melcher; I S Sigalovsky; J J Guinan; R A Levine
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Comparison of auditory deficits associated with neglect and auditory cortex lesions.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Tobias Brandt; Andreas Bartsch; Claudia Jansen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Structural and functional brain rewiring clarifies preserved interhemispheric transfer in humans born without the corpus callosum.

Authors:  Fernanda Tovar-Moll; Myriam Monteiro; Juliana Andrade; Ivanei E Bramati; Rodrigo Vianna-Barbosa; Theo Marins; Erika Rodrigues; Natalia Dantas; Timothy E J Behrens; Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza; Jorge Moll; Roberto Lent
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Lateralization and Binaural Interaction of Middle-Latency and Late-Brainstem Components of the Auditory Evoked Response.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Daniel Burchard; Christian Starzynski; Helmut Riedel; Andre Rupp; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-19

3.  Cortical hemispheric asymmetries are present at young ages and further develop into adolescence.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yamazaki; Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Melissa Jane Polonenko; Salima Jiwani; Daniel D E Wong; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Susan A McLaughlin; Teemu Rinne; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Monaural and binaural contributions to interaural-level-difference sensitivity in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Susan A McLaughlin; Nathan C Higgins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The association between subcortical and cortical fMRI and lifetime noise exposure in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Rebecca S Dewey; Susan T Francis; Hannah Guest; Garreth Prendergast; Rebecca E Millman; Christopher J Plack; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.