Literature DB >> 4006489

Participation in a clinical trial: the patients' point of view.

M E Mattson, J D Curb, R McArdle.   

Abstract

Little systematic information is available concerning the advantages and disadvantages of participation in a clinical trial from the patients' point of view. Surveys were undertaken among participants in the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT) and the Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study (AMIS) to obtain data on these perceptions. In AMIS, an open-ended personal interview format was employed. For BHAT, a questionnaire partially based on hypotheses generated in AMIS, was mailed out. Results from the two studies suggested that patients in both trials felt that the additional medical monitoring, the opportunity for a "second opinion," and the reassurance received were more important benefits than actual physical improvement. Altruistic motivations were high in both studies. Frequency of perceived disadvantages was low, centering mainly around transportation problems and clinic waiting time. The large majority of patients indicated that they would volunteer for similar research in the future. The results are discussed in the context of the available literature and of the possibilities for extensions of this line of research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspirin Myocardial Infarction Study (AMIS); Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial (BHAT); Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4006489     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90121-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  45 in total

1.  Conducting randomized trials in general practice: methodological and practical issues.

Authors:  E Ward; M King; M Lloyd; P Bower; K Friedli
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Clinical research in the private office setting--ethical issues.

Authors:  Alan R Fleischman; Jason E Klein
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2002

3.  The Tuskegee Legacy Project: history, preliminary scientific findings, and unanticipated societal benefits.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; S Stephen Kegeles; B Lee Green; Nancy R Kressin; Sherman A James; Cristina Claudio
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2003-01

Review 4.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Hewison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

6.  Is recruitment more difficult with a placebo arm in randomised controlled trials? A quasirandomised, interview based study.

Authors:  A J Welton; M R Vickers; J A Cooper; T W Meade; T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-24

7.  Evaluating the decisions of glioma patients regarding clinical trial participation: a retrospective single provider review.

Authors:  Grant W Jirka; Karl Stessy M Bisselou; Lynette M Smith; Nicole Shonka
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Participating in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): a qualitative study of patients' experiences.

Authors:  Julia Lawton; Anna Fox; Charles Fox; Ann Louise Kinmonth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K Featherstone; J L Donovan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

10.  Receipt of psychosocial care among cancer survivors in the United States.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Erin E Kent; Kathryn E Weaver; Natasha Buchanan; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan L Rodriguez; A Blythe Ryerson; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.