Literature DB >> 12830569

Participating in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS): a qualitative study of patients' experiences.

Julia Lawton1, Anna Fox, Charles Fox, Ann Louise Kinmonth.   

Abstract

The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) is one of the longest and largest clinical trials ever conducted. It explored the effects of intensive blood glucose and blood pressure control on the development of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients took part in this trial for up to 20 years and the drop-out rate was extremely low. The aim of this discussion paper is to explore patients' motivations for joining the UKPDS and for remaining in the trial, and to examine the implications of findings for good practice before, during, and after clinical trials. A qualitative, exploratory study was undertaken, involving former UKPDS patients (n = 10) at Northampton General Hospital, England. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were undertaken and the data analysed using grounded theory approaches. The results showed that patients were motivated to join the UKPDS because they believed this would give them the best clinical care and reduce the threat of the disease. However, all of the patients identified unanticipated benefits of trial participation, to which they attributed their strong commitment to the UKPDS. These included the reassurance provided by regular clinical examinations, the personal nature of clinical care, and the welcome discipline imposed by UKPDS professionals. Transition back to primary care at trial closure could be a lonely experience, despite follow-up being seen as competent. Practitioners involved in recruiting patients for clinical trials should be aware that participants may be motivated by the desire for better clinical care, irrespective of randomisation consequences. Those taking back the clinical care of trial participants with chronic disease may wish to consider a 're-entry' interview, to minimise trial bereavement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12830569      PMCID: PMC1314601     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  21 in total

1.  Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes.

Authors:  B McKinstry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-07

2.  Diabetes care from diagnosis: effects of training in patient-centred care on beliefs, attitudes and behaviour of primary care professionals.

Authors:  A J Woodcock; A L Kinmonth; M J Campbell; S J Griffin; N M Spiegal
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-05

3.  Barriers to uptake of services for coronary heart disease: qualitative study.

Authors:  A M Tod; C Read; A Lacey; J Abbott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-28

4.  A need to try everything: patient participation in phase I trials.

Authors:  S Moore
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 5.  Diabetes care: the effectiveness of systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes.

Authors:  S Griffin; A L Kinmonth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

Review 6.  Are randomized clinical trials good for us (in the short term)? Evidence for a "trial effect".

Authors:  D A Braunholtz; S J Edwards; R J Lilford
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study for general practice care of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; S Griffin; N J Wareham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  P M Ellis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Participation in a clinical trial: the patients' point of view.

Authors:  M E Mattson; J D Curb; R McArdle
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1985-06

10.  Irritable bowel syndrome: attrition rates of patients identified at primary care centers during a 50-week period versus those identified in hospitals in a phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  R Dal-Ré; A Luque; L Guardiola; F Rodríguez
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Res       Date:  2001
View more
  22 in total

1.  The new GMS contract--a Trojan horse?

Authors:  Shamini Gnani; Allyson M Pollock
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Laura E Tesler; Torsten L Christensen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Patients' experiences of continuity in the care of type 2 diabetes: a focus group study in primary care.

Authors:  Mohammed H Alazri; Richard D Neal; Phil Heywood; Brenda Leese
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Rationale and study protocol for Unidas por la Vida (United for Life): A dyadic weight-loss intervention for high-risk Latina mothers and their adult daughters.

Authors:  Dara H Sorkin; Karen S Rook; Belinda Campos; Becky Marquez; Jessica Solares; Dana B Mukamel; Bess Marcus; David Kilgore; Emily Dow; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Danh V Nguyen; Kelly Biegler
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Reasons for and reservations about research participation in acutely injured adults.

Authors:  Elliane Irani; Therese S Richmond
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.176

6.  Motivations of Patients with Diabetes to Participate in Research.

Authors:  Cynthia Geppert; Philip Candilis; Stephen Baker; Charles Lidz; Paul Appelbaum; Kenneth Fletcher
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2014

7.  Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self.

Authors:  Sharon K McCann; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Disseminating results to clinical trial participants: a qualitative review of patient understanding in a post-trial population.

Authors:  Julie Lorraine Darbyshire; Hermione Clare Price
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Challenges of maintaining research protocol fidelity in a clinical care setting: a qualitative study of the experiences and views of patients and staff participating in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Julia Lawton; Nicholas Jenkins; Julie L Darbyshire; Rury R Holman; Andrew J Farmer; Nina Hallowell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Duty, desire or indifference? A qualitative study of patient decisions about recruitment to an epilepsy treatment trial.

Authors:  Krysia Canvin; Ann Jacoby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.