Literature DB >> 4003185

Incontinence in the elderly: prevalence and prognosis.

A J Campbell, J Reinken, L McCosh.   

Abstract

In a randomly selected sample of 559 subjects 65 years and over living in the community and in institutions the prevalence of urinary incontinence was found to be 11.6%. In those 80 years and over the prevalence rose to 21.7%. Those with dementia were more likely to be incontinent than those with normal mental function. In the majority of those over 80 who were incontinent, the incontinence was associated with either confusion or a combination of factors. The estimated population prevalence of faecal incontinence for those 65 years and over was 3.1%. Urinary incontinence was associated with an increased risk of death. In a review of subjects after three years 73.5% of the incontinent group had died while only 34.9% of those originally continent had died. Because incontinent elderly people are commonly frail, with a number of conditions contributing to the disorder, the extent of investigation of the disorder needs to be carefully assessed for each patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4003185     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/14.2.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Neuromuscular dysfunction of the lower urinary tract dysfunction beyond spinal cord injury and multiple sclerosis. A challenge for urologists].

Authors:  A Reitz; C Fisang; S C Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Incidence and remission rates of lower urinary tract symptoms at one year in women aged 40-60: longitudinal study.

Authors:  L A Møller; G Lose; T Jørgensen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

3.  The challenge of urinary incontinence in the elderly.

Authors:  G Worrall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients.

Authors:  Gino C Matibag; Hiroshi Nakazawa; Paolo Giamundo; Hiko Tamashiro
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Anal function in geriatric patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  J A Barrett; J C Brocklehurst; E S Kiff; G Ferguson; E B Faragher
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: long-term clinical, manometric and quality of life results.

Authors:  P Moya; A Arroyo; J Lacueva; F Candela; L Soriano-Irigaray; A López; M A Gómez; I Galindo; R Calpena
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Prevalence of urinary incontinence in patients receiving home care services.

Authors:  E A Mohide; D M Pringle; D Robertson; L W Chambers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Comparison between elderly inpatient fallers with and without dementia.

Authors:  Si Ching Lim; Kaysar Mamun; Jim K H Lim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 9.  Rational prescribing for postmenopausal urogenital complaints.

Authors:  I Milsom
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Factors contributing to fecal incontinence in older people and outcome of routine management in home, hospital and nursing home settings.

Authors:  Asangaedem Akpan; Margot A Gosney; James Barret
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.