Literature DB >> 21432098

Trends and current issues in adult fecal incontinence (FI): Towards enhancing the quality of life for FI patients.

Gino C Matibag1, Hiroshi Nakazawa, Paolo Giamundo, Hiko Tamashiro.   

Abstract

Our goals are to review the literature on the definition and epidemiology of fecal incontinence (FI), the risk factors involved, available treatment options, and measurement of the quality of life (QOL) of patients with this condition. Articles included for review were searched following the guidelines set by Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook. FI was defined variously depending upon the duration, type, and amount of leakage. About 17 published papers were reviewed on the prevalence of FI that ranged from 1.4% to 50%. Potential risk factors included perianal injury/surgery, and fair/poor general health. QOL assessment using various grading scales provided an objective method of evaluating patients before and after treatment. Management included medical, physiotherapy, and surgical options. Through the range of various references, a clear definition of FI should be specified, which reflects its epidemiology in the various studies. These differences in definition would significantly affect its prevalence. Many risk factors have been sited but further epidemiological studies are necessary to elucidate FI. Understanding the etiology of the disease is an important initial step to provide adequate treatment of FI. QOL assessment provides objective and subjective method in the analysis of effectiveness of therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anal incontinence; epidemiology; fecal incontinence; quality of life; risk factors

Year:  2003        PMID: 21432098      PMCID: PMC2723386          DOI: 10.1007/BF02897914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med        ISSN: 1342-078X            Impact factor:   3.674


  84 in total

1.  Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter.

Authors:  B J Mander; S D Wexner; N S Williams; D C Bartolo; D Z Lubowski; T Oresland; G Romano; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Incontinence in institutions: costs and contributing factors.

Authors:  M J Borrie; H A Davidson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Treatment options for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; A Wald; N J Norton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Prospective study of the effects of postanal repair in neurogenic faecal incontinence.

Authors:  N R Womack; J F Morrison; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Delayed external sphincter repair for obstetric tear.

Authors:  S Laurberg; M Swash; M M Henry
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Management of anal incontinence by biofeedback.

Authors:  J H MacLeod
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  [Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in fecal incontinence in general practice of the surgically educated proctologist].

Authors:  J U Bock; J Jongen
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 0.942

8.  Survival and functional capacity: three year follow up of an elderly population in hospitals and homes.

Authors:  L J Donaldson; C Jagger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Urinary incontinence in the elderly with implications for hospital care consumption and social disability.

Authors:  P Ekelund; A Rundgren
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete obstetric anal sphincter tear.

Authors:  K M Bek; S Laurberg
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.