Literature DB >> 4000278

Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice.

B M Cattanach, M Kirk.   

Abstract

Although both parental sexes contribute equivalent genetic information to the zygote, in mammals this information is not necessarily functionally equivalent. Diploid parthenotes possessing two maternal genomes are generally inviable, embryos possessing two paternal genomes in man may form hydatidiform moles, and nuclear transplantation experiments in mice have shown that both parental genomes are necessary for complete embryogenesis. Not all of the genome is involved in these parental effects, however, because zygotes with maternal or paternal disomy for chromosomes 1, 4, 5, 9, 13, 14 and 15 of the mouse survive normally. On the other hand, only the maternal X chromosome is active in mouse extraembryonic membranes, maternal disomy 6 is lethal, while non-complementation of maternal duplication/paternal deficiency or its reciprocal for regions of chromosome 2, 8 and 17 has been recognized. We report that animals with maternal duplication/paternal deficiency and its reciprocal for each of two particular chromosome regions show anomalous phenotypes which depart from normal in opposite directions, suggesting a differential functioning of gene loci within these regions. A further example of non-complementation lethality is also reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4000278     DOI: 10.1038/315496a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  157 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting: implications for human disease.

Authors:  J G Falls; D J Pulford; A A Wylie; R L Jirtle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Parental allele-specific chromatin configuration in a boundary-imprinting-control element upstream of the mouse H19 gene.

Authors:  S Khosla; A Aitchison; R Gregory; N D Allen; R Feil
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Silver-Russell syndrome: a dissection of the genetic aetiology and candidate chromosomal regions.

Authors:  M P Hitchins; P Stanier; M A Preece; G E Moore
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  M Alleman; J Doctor
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  One hundred years of mouse genetics: an intellectual history. II. The molecular revolution (1981-2002).

Authors:  Kenneth Paigen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  The genetics of the Silver-Russell syndrome.

Authors:  Michael A Preece
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 7.  Close yet so far away: a look into the management strategies of genetic imprinting disorders.

Authors:  Mark A Pianka; Alec T McIntosh; Sahaj D Patel; Pegah R Bakhshi; Mira Jung
Journal:  Am J Stem Cells       Date:  2018-10-01

Review 8.  Regulation and flexibility of genomic imprinting during seed development.

Authors:  Michael T Raissig; Célia Baroux; Ueli Grossniklaus
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Recent acquisition of imprinting at the rodent Sfmbt2 locus correlates with insertion of a large block of miRNAs.

Authors:  Qianwei Wang; Jacqueline Chow; Jenny Hong; Anne Ferguson Smith; Carol Moreno; Peter Seaby; Paul Vrana; Kamelia Miri; Joon Tak; Eu Ddeum Chung; Gabriela Mastromonaco; Isabella Caniggia; Susannah Varmuza
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The polar-lethal Ovum mutant gene maps to the distal portion of mouse chromosome 11.

Authors:  C Sapienza; J Paquette; P Pannunzio; S Albrechtson; K Morgan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.