Literature DB >> 1398057

The polar-lethal Ovum mutant gene maps to the distal portion of mouse chromosome 11.

C Sapienza1, J Paquette, P Pannunzio, S Albrechtson, K Morgan.   

Abstract

Genome imprinting is the process by which identical alleles at a particular locus may be rendered functionally different depending on the sex of the parent contributing the allele. While several mutations in imprinted genes have been defined, no variants in the regulatory system that gives rise to imprinting have been described. Here we report our genetic analysis of the behavior of the interstrain, polar, embryonic-lethal phenotype known as the "DDK syndrome." We have mapped the interstrain, polar-lethal region of the genome to the distal portion of mouse chromosome 11, near the Xmv-42 locus. We propose that the lethal phenotype is not caused by a standard mutation, but by aberrant imprinting of a gene within this region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1398057      PMCID: PMC1205122     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  19 in total

1.  A reliable method for the use of oligonucleotides as probes in blot-hybridization experiments.

Authors:  J Paquette; C Sapienza
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  A cytogenetic and genetic characterization of a group of closely linked second chromosome mutations that suppress position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D A Sinclair; A A Ruddell; J K Brock; N J Clegg; V K Lloyd; T A Grigliatti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Dependence of position-effect variegation in Drosophila on dose of a gene encoding an unusual zinc-finger protein.

Authors:  G Reuter; M Giarre; J Farah; J Gausz; A Spierer; P Spierer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  DDK egg-foreign sperm incompatibility in mice is not between the pronuclei.

Authors:  J R Mann
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1986-03

5.  Studies on fertility of DDK mice: reciprocal crosses between DDK and C57BL/6J strains and experimental transplantation of the ovary.

Authors:  N Wakasugi
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1973-05

Review 6.  Autosomal and X-chromosome imprinting.

Authors:  B M Cattanach; C V Beechey
Journal:  Dev Suppl       Date:  1990

7.  The mouse insulin-like growth factor type-2 receptor is imprinted and closely linked to the Tme locus.

Authors:  D P Barlow; R Stöger; B G Herrmann; K Saito; N Schweifer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The locus Om, responsible for the DDK syndrome, maps close to Sigje on mouse chromosome 11.

Authors:  P A Baldacci; V Richoux; J P Renard; J L Guénet; C Babinet
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Identification of a paternal developmental effect on the cytoplasm of one-cell-stage mouse embryos.

Authors:  J P Renard; C Babinet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Towards construction of a high resolution map of the mouse genome using PCR-analysed microsatellites.

Authors:  J M Love; A M Knight; M A McAleer; J A Todd
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  21 in total

1.  Heritability of the maternal meiotic drive system linked to Om and high-resolution mapping of the Responder locus in mouse.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel De Villena; E de La Casa-Esperón; J W Williams; J M Malette; M Rosa; C Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Male-offspring-specific, haplotype-dependent, nonrandom cosegregation of alleles at loci on two mouse chromosomes.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; E de la Casa-Esperon; T L Briscoe; J M Malette; C Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sex-of-offspring-specific transmission ratio distortion on mouse chromosome X.

Authors:  E de la Casa-Esperon; F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; A E Verner; T L Briscoe; J M Malette; M Rosa; W H Jin; C Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A genetic test to determine the origin of maternal transmission ratio distortion. Meiotic drive at the mouse Om locus.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; E de la Casa-Esperon; T L Briscoe; C Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomic imprinting and position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  V K Lloyd; D A Sinclair; T A Grigliatti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  BALB/c alleles at modifier loci increase the severity of the maternal effect of the "DDK syndrome".

Authors:  S Le Bras; M Cohen-Tannoudji; C Kress; S Vandormael-Pournin; C Babinet; P Baldacci
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Maternal transmission ratio distortion at the mouse Om locus results from meiotic drive at the second meiotic division.

Authors:  Guangming Wu; Lanping Hao; Zhiming Han; Shaorong Gao; Keith E Latham; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The paternal gene of the DDK syndrome maps to the Schlafen gene cluster on mouse chromosome 11.

Authors:  Timothy A Bell; Elena de la Casa-Esperón; Heather E Doherty; Folami Ideraabdullah; Kuikwon Kim; Yunfei Wang; Leslie A Lange; Kirk Wilhemsen; Ethan M Lange; Carmen Sapienza; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Hybrid vigor and transgenerational epigenetic effects on early mouse embryo phenotype.

Authors:  Zhiming Han; Namdori R Mtango; Bela G Patel; Carmen Sapienza; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  The genetics of retinoblastoma, revisited.

Authors:  A Naumova; C Sapienza
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.