Literature DB >> 399200

On the perception of speech sounds as biologically significant signals.

D B Pisoni.   

Abstract

This paper reviews some of the major evidence and arguments currently available to support the view that human speech perception may require the use of specialized neural mechanisms for perceptual analysis. Experiments using synthetically produced speech signals with adults are briefly summarized and extensions of these results to infants and ther organisms are reviewed with an emphasis towards detailing those aspects of speech perception that may require some need for specialized species-specific processors. Finally, some comments on the role of early experience in perceptual development are provided as an attempt to identify promising areas of new research in speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 399200      PMCID: PMC3512094          DOI: 10.1159/000121875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  23 in total

1.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment?

Authors:  J J GIBSON; E J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech.

Authors:  C G FANT
Journal:  Logos       Date:  1962-04

3.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

4.  Pair discrimination for a continuum of synthetic voiced stops with and without first and third formants.

Authors:  R D Popper
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1972-09

5.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1973-06-01

6.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Jeffrey Tash
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1974

Review 7.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Theoretical notes. Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane's critical review.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy; A M Liberman; K S Harris; F S Cooper
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Speech perception in infants.

Authors:  P D Eimas; E R Siqueland; P Jusczyk; J Vigorito
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Visual experience modifies distribution of horizontally and vertically oriented receptive fields in cats.

Authors:  H V Hirsch; D N Spinelli
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation.

Authors:  Jean-François Patri; David J Ostry; Julien Diard; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Pamela Trudeau-Fisette; Christophe Savariaux; Pascal Perrier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.