Literature DB >> 8187701

Predicting carcinogenicity by using batteries of dependent short-term tests.

B S Kim1, B H Margolin.   

Abstract

Among the various methods for predicting carcinogenicity from a battery of short-term tests (STTs), the carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) procedure is the most prominent. A major assumption of CPBS is that the STTs used in the prediction are conditionally independent. Results of recent National Toxicology Program studies of four commonly used in vitro STTs contradict this assumption, thereby necessitating modification of CPBS to accommodate dependencies. This is accomplished via log-linear modeling, which then also yields an important dividend: standard errors for the predicted probabilities of carcinogenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8187701      PMCID: PMC1566897          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102s1127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of four in vitro genetic toxicity tests for predicting rodent carcinogenicity: confirmation of earlier results with 41 additional chemicals.

Authors:  E Zeiger; J K Haseman; M D Shelby; B H Margolin; R W Tennant
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Cost-effectiveness of short-term tests for carcinogenicity.

Authors:  L B Lave; G S Omenn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Nov 6-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Performance of short-term tests for detection of human carcinogens.

Authors:  T Kuroki; T Matsushima
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Application of the carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection method to recent National Toxicology Program short-term test data.

Authors:  F K Ennever; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Short-term test results for NTP noncarcinogens: an alternate, more predictive battery.

Authors:  F K Ennever; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1986

6.  Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays.

Authors:  R W Tennant; B H Margolin; M D Shelby; E Zeiger; J K Haseman; J Spalding; W Caspary; M Resnick; S Stasiewicz; B Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Screening program theory: decision functions and protocols.

Authors:  C Denniston
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1985

8.  Application of the carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method to the Gene-Tox data base.

Authors:  J Pet-Edwards; V Chankong; H S Rosenkranz; Y Y Haimes
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  The carcinogenicity prediction and battery selection (CPBS) method: a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  V Chankong; Y Y Haimes; H S Rosenkranz; J Pet-Edwards
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  An evaluation of 6 short-term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens.

Authors:  I F Purchase; E Longstaff; J Ashby; J A Styles; D Anderson; P A Lefevre; F R Westwood
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.