Literature DB >> 3982058

The porcine bioprosthetic valve. Twelve years later.

D J Magilligan, J W Lewis, B Tilley, E Peterson.   

Abstract

The porcine bioprosthetic heart valve has been commercially available since 1970 and has been the prosthetic heart valve of choice in our institution since 1971. Since that time 817 patients with 951 porcine valves have been discharged from the hospital and were available for long-term follow-up. Patient survival rates, with operative mortality excluded, were 80% +/- 1.7% (standard error) at 5 years and 68% +/- 2.7% at 10 years. Survival rates for patients with aortic valve prostheses were 78% +/- 2.8% at 5 years and 57% +/- 5.4% at 10 years; for patients with mitral valve prostheses, survival rates were 80% +/- 2.2% at 5 years and 69% +/- 3.2% at 10 years. Freedom from thromboembolism for aortic valves was 93% +/- 1.4% at 5 years and 88% +/- 2.6% at 10 years; for mitral valves the freedom from degeneration or primary tissue failure for aortic valves was 97% +/- 1.3% at 5 years and 71% +/- 7.6% at 10 years; for mitral valves these figures were 96% +/- 1.2% at 5 years and 71% +/- 4.1% at 10 years. Valves in patients 35 years of age and below had a significantly greater rate of degeneration (p less than 0.001). After 12 years' experience the porcine bioprosthetic valve has performed well with regard to patient survival and low rate of thromboembolism. For patients older than 35 years the freedom from primary tissue failure is 80% at 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3982058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  14 in total

Review 1.  Stem Cell Sources and Graft Material for Vascular Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Dorothee Hielscher; Constanze Kaebisch; Benedikt Julius Valentin Braun; Kevin Gray; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  Valve prostheses and pregnancy.

Authors:  C Oakley
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-10

3.  Rapidly deteriorated failure of Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis caused by three detached commissures: report of a case.

Authors:  Y Terada; Y Wanibuchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Echocardiographic assessment of artificial heart valves: British Society of Echocardiography position paper.

Authors:  J Chambers; A Fraser; P Lawford; P Nihoyannopoulos; I Simpson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-04

Review 5.  Immunogenicity in xenogeneic scaffold generation: antigen removal vs. decellularization.

Authors:  Maelene L Wong; Leigh G Griffiths
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 8.947

6.  Fifteen-year experience with 1678 Hancock porcine bioprosthetic heart valve replacements.

Authors:  L H Cohn; J J Collins; V J DiSesa; G S Couper; P S Peigh; W Kowalker; E Allred
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Patients' observations of bioprosthetic valve failure: "my heart is honking, doctor".

Authors:  M Errington; P Bloomfield; I R Starkey; T R Shaw
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-12

8.  Determinants of long-term survival after isolated aortic valve replacement: a 10- to 17-year follow-up.

Authors:  O Lund
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1987-06

9.  Double valve Implantation. Long-term evaluation of 8 different bioprostheses.

Authors:  P Stassano; V Mannacio; A Musumeci; A Golino; P Maida; V Ferrigno; G Buonocore; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1991

10.  The bioprosthetic valve of choice for high-risk patients: long-term results (up to 10 years).

Authors:  P Stassano; C Gagliardi; L Matarazzo; A Musumeci; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1985-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.