Literature DB >> 2802832

Fifteen-year experience with 1678 Hancock porcine bioprosthetic heart valve replacements.

L H Cohn1, J J Collins, V J DiSesa, G S Couper, P S Peigh, W Kowalker, E Allred.   

Abstract

The Hancock porcine valve was the first commercially available biologic heart valve and has been in continuous use at the Brigham and Women's Hospital since January 1972. Through December 1987 we implanted 1678 valves in 1533 patients (885 male; 648 female; 17 to 95 years of age, with a mean of 60 years). There were 825 aortic valve replacements (AVR), 562 isolated mitral valve replacements (MVR), and 146 aortic mitral replacements (DVR). Ninety-four per cent of the patients were functional class III or IV. Associated coronary bypass was done in 25% of patients. Four per cent of patients were lost to follow up during a 1- to 16-year period with a mean of 6 years. Morbidity and mortality rates on a actuarial basis were calculated 10 and 15 years after operation for AVR, MVR, and DVR. The data indicates that the probability of reoperation for structural valve failure is quite reasonable as of 10 years, but from 10 to 15 years the numbers sharply fall off so that the probable effective life of the valve is 10 years. However in the elderly age group (equal to or greater than 70 years of age) the incidence of structural valve degeneration is markedly diminished, making this an ideal valve substitute for the elderly. It is also an ideal valve substitute in any patient who has a contraindication to long-term anticoagulation because of current medical or surgical problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2802832      PMCID: PMC1357917          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198910000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  20 in total

1.  HOMOGRAFT AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN AORTIC INCOMPETENCE AND STENOSIS.

Authors:  B G BARRATT-BOYES
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  HETEROLOGOUS AORTIC-VALVE TRANSPLANTATION IN THE DOG.

Authors:  C G DURAN; A J GUNNING
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1965-07-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis.

Authors:  A STARR; M L EDWARDS
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Homograft replacement of the aortic valve.

Authors:  D N ROSS
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1962-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Incidence of primary tissue valve failure in porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  I Gallo; F Nistal; R Blasquez; E Arbe; E Artiñano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Biological factors affecting long-term results of valvular heterografts.

Authors:  A Carpentier; G Lemaigre; L Robert; S Carpentier; C Dubost
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Long-term evaluation of the porcine xenograft bioprosthesis.

Authors:  P E Oyer; E B Stinson; B A Reitz; D C Miller; S J Rossiter; N E Shumway
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  The Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a comparative study analyzing failure rates by age.

Authors:  D F Pupello; L N Bessone; S P Hiro; E Lopez-Cuenca; M S Glatterer; G Ebra
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.620

9.  Five to eight-year follow-up of patients undergoing porcine heart-valve replacement.

Authors:  L H Cohn; G H Mudge; F Pratter; J J Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis following aortic valve replacement: considerations based on a 15-year experience.

Authors:  A D Milano; U Bortolotti; A Mazzucco; F Guerra; G Stellin; E Talenti; G Thiene; V Gallucci
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Prosthetic valve selection for middle-aged patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Joanna Chikwe; Farzan Filsoufi; Alain F Carpentier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  In Search of the Ideal Valve: Optimizing Genetic Modifications to Prevent Bioprosthetic Degeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin Smood; Hidetaka Hara; David C Cleveland; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves.

Authors:  Takahiro Nishida; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

Review 4.  Biomechanical Behavior of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Heterograft Tissues: Characterization, Simulation, and Performance.

Authors:  Joao S Soares; Kristen R Feaver; Will Zhang; David Kamensky; Ankush Aggarwal; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.495

5.  Complications of prosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Jeanne M Vesey; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  A Biohybrid Material With Extracellular Matrix Core and Polymeric Coating as a Cell Honing Cardiovascular Tissue Substitute.

Authors:  Jahnavi Mudigonda; Dongyang Xu; Alan Amedi; Brooks A Lane; Daniella Corporan; Vivian Wang; Muralidhar Padala
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.