Literature DB >> 3976963

Comparative risks and costs of male and female sterilization.

G L Smith, G P Taylor, K F Smith.   

Abstract

Couples who are considering elective sterilization should compare the risks and costs of male and female sterilization procedures as part of the decision process. Morbidity, mortality, failure rates, and short-term costs associated with male and female sterilization procedures were estimated from data available in previous case series. Male sterilization procedures were found to have zero attributable deaths and significantly less major complications when compared to female sterilization procedures. No less than 14 deaths a year can be attributed to female sterilization procedures in the US. Male and female sterilization procedures have efficacy rates that are not significantly different from each other. The short-term costs of female sterilization are 3.0 to 4.1 times that of vasectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3976963      PMCID: PMC1646249          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.75.4.370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  24 in total

1.  The mortality risk of voluntary surgical contraception.

Authors:  G L Rubin; H W Ory; P M Layde
Journal:  Biomed Bull       Date:  1982-12

2.  American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 1976 membership survey.

Authors:  J M Phillips; J Hulka; B Hulka; D Keith; L Keith
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 0.142

Review 3.  Sterilization: a comparative review.

Authors:  J D Keeping; A Chang; J Morrison
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.100

4.  Complications of laparoscopic tubal sterilization.

Authors:  R G Cunanan; N G Courey; J Lippes
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Vasectomy--1980.

Authors:  L I Lipshultz; G S Benson
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  The effects of sterilisation: a comparison of sterilised women with the wives of vasectomised men.

Authors:  E Alder; A Cook; J Gray; G Tyrer; P Warner; J Bancroft; N B Loudon; J Loudon
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  A retrospective survey of female sterilisation for the years 1968 to 1973. Analysis of morbidity and post-sterilisation complications for 5 years.

Authors:  J R Newton; S Gillman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  High rate of ectopic pregnancy following laparoscopic tubal coagulation failures. Incidence and etiology.

Authors:  A McCausland
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-01-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Vasectomy and health. Results from a large cohort study.

Authors:  F J Massey; G S Bernstein; W M O'Fallon; L M Schuman; A H Coulson; R Crozier; J S Mandel; R B Benjamin; H W Berendes; P C Chang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984 Aug 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Vasectomy in the United States, 1991 and 1995.

Authors:  R J Magnani; J M Haws; G T Morgan; P M Gargiullo; A E Pollack; L M Koonin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Sterilization: Canadian choices.

Authors:  P M Alderman; E M Gee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Vasectomy in the United States, 1991.

Authors:  C M Marquette; L M Koonin; L Antarsh; P M Gargiullo; J C Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  On risks, costs of sterilization.

Authors:  D A Grimes; H B Peterson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Attitudes towards vasectomy and its acceptance as a method of contraception among clinical-year medical students in a Malaysian private medical college.

Authors:  Saw Ohn Mar; Osman Ali; Sugathan Sandheep; Zul Husayni; Muhammad Zuhri
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Vasectomies: Motivations and Attitude of Physicians-as-Patients.

Authors:  P M Alderman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Spousal veto over family planning services.

Authors:  R J Cook; D Maine
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Barriers and facilitators affecting vasectomy acceptability (a multi stages study in a sample from north eastern of Iran), 2005-2007.

Authors:  Afsaneh Keramat; Afsaneh Zarei; Masoumeh Arabi
Journal:  Asia Pac Fam Med       Date:  2011-05-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.