Literature DB >> 9987475

Vasectomy in the United States, 1991 and 1995.

R J Magnani1, J M Haws, G T Morgan, P M Gargiullo, A E Pollack, L M Koonin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess whether the controversy surrounding publications linking vasectomy and prostate cancer has had an effect on vasectomy acceptance and practice in the United States.
METHODS: National probability surveys of urology, general surgery, and family practices were undertaken in 1992 and 1996.
RESULTS: Estimates of the total number of vasectomies performed, population rate, and proportion of practices performing vasectomy were not significantly different in 1991 and 1995.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides no solid evidence that the recent controversy over prostate cancer has influenced vasectomy acceptance or practice in the United States. However, the use of vasectomy appears to have leveled off in the 1990s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9987475      PMCID: PMC1508517          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.89.1.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  Trends in contraceptive practice: 1965-1973.

Authors:  C F Westoff
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr

2.  Fecundity and infertility in the United States.

Authors:  W D Mosher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Comparative risks and costs of male and female sterilization.

Authors:  G L Smith; G P Taylor; K F Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Vasectomy in the United States, 1991.

Authors:  C M Marquette; L M Koonin; L Antarsh; P M Gargiullo; J C Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Vasectomy and prostate cancer.

Authors:  A E Pollack
Journal:  Adv Contracept       Date:  1993-06

6.  Vasectomy and prostate cancer. Chance, bias, or a causal relationship?

Authors:  S S Howards; H B Peterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Contraceptive practice in the United States, 1982-1988.

Authors:  W D Mosher
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct

8.  Male or female sterilization: a comparative study.

Authors:  A G Kjersgaard; I Thranov; O V Rasmussen; J Hertz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  A retrospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men.

Authors:  E Giovannucci; T D Tosteson; F E Speizer; A Ascherio; M P Vessey; G A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Vasectomy and prostate cancer: results from a multiethnic case-control study.

Authors:  E M John; A S Whittemore; A H Wu; L N Kolonel; T G Hislop; G R Howe; D W West; J Hankin; D M Dreon; C Z Teh
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  4 in total

1.  Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: data from the national survey of family growth.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Jillian T Henderson; John K Amory; James F Smith; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Advances in male contraception.

Authors:  Stephanie T Page; John K Amory; William J Bremner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  A randomized, controlled, multicenter contraceptive efficacy clinical trial of the intravas device, a nonocclusive surgical male sterilization.

Authors:  Wen-Hong Lu; Xiao-Wei Liang; Yi-Qun Gu; Wei-Xiong Wu; Li-Wei Bo; Tian-Gui Zheng; Zhen-Wen Chen
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Vasectomy: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Dane Johnson; Jay I Sandlow
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.