| Literature DB >> 6449354 |
Abstract
Between 1968 and 1973, 2122 women were sterilised, 52.2% were by laparotomy, 46.3% by laparoscopy. Sterilisation was performed after abortion in 38.5%, after delivery in 22.5%, and as an interval procedure in 38.5% of cases. Laparoscopy had a lower incidence of side effects than laparotomy, and sterilisation as an interval procedure was safer than after delivery or abortion. A five-year follow-up of patients revealed a low incidence of late side effects; only 34 patients required hysterectomy and in 18 this was not due to the sterilisation. Failure of sterilisation (0.5%) was evenly distributed between the various methods; operative trauma was low 0.6% for laparoscopy and 0.2% for laparotomy. There were 4 maternal deaths, only 2 were related to the procedure.Entities:
Keywords: Age Factors; Bleeding; Cesarean Section; Contraception Failure; Family Planning; Female Sterilization--side effects; Gynecologic Surgery; Interval Sterilization; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Mortality; Obstetrical Surgery; Pain; Parity; Postabortion; Postcesarean Section; Puerperium; Pulmonary Embolism; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Sterilization, Sexual; Studies; Surgery; Surveys; Treatment; Urogenital Surgery
Mesh:
Year: 1980 PMID: 6449354 DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(80)80008-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contraception ISSN: 0010-7824 Impact factor: 3.375