Literature DB >> 3976707

Are patients with hip fractures more osteoporotic? Review of the evidence.

S R Cummings.   

Abstract

This report critically reviews 15 case-control studies that disagree about whether patients who fracture their hip are significantly more osteoporotic than persons of similar age who do not. The most rigorously designed studies observed less bone mass in the hips of patients with fractures than in the hips of control subjects, but the differences were usually small and overlapping. Measurements at other sites in the skeleton did not consistently find differences. Those studies that protected against ascertainment bias generally found smaller differences than studies that did not. Patients with hip fractures do not appear to be distinctly more osteoporotic than persons of similar age. Therefore, factors besides bone mass, such as a tendency to fall, may be important determinants of which elderly persons will have fractures; thus, measurements of bone mass might not be a reliable way to identify those at greatest risk of hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3976707     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90343-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  61 in total

1.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Infrared assessment of bone quality: a review.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Paschalis; Richard Mendelsohn; Adele L Boskey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro; D Agnusdei; R Palmieri; S Rossi; C Gennari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  [New techniques for the diagnosis of osteoporosis].

Authors:  A S Issever; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  The pathogenesis and treatment of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Lips; K J Obrant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Fourier transform infrared analysis and bone.

Authors:  E P Paschalis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Trabecular bone structure analysis in the osteoporotic spine using a clinical in vivo setup for 64-slice MDCT imaging: comparison to microCT imaging and microFE modeling.

Authors:  Ahi S Issever; Thomas M Link; Marie Kentenich; Patrik Rogalla; Karsten Schwieger; Markus B Huber; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar; Gerd Diederichs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Impact near the hip dominates fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents who fall.

Authors:  W C Hayes; E R Myers; J N Morris; T N Gerhart; H S Yett; L A Lipsitz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.