Literature DB >> 3971612

Clinical and roentgenographic assessment of total hip arthroplasty. A new hip score.

B F Kavanagh, R H Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

A new total hip scoring system is presented and applied in a group of patients who were treated by revision of total hip arthroplasty. The Mayo hip score combines clinical (80 points) and roentgenographic (20 points) data in a 100-point score. The roentgenographic input into the score decreased the percentage of good-to-excellent results because of the high frequency of roentgenographic signs of loosening. With the Harris rating, there were 63% good-to-excellent results, 12% fair results, and 26% poor results a mean of 4.25 years after component revision of total hip arthroplasty. With the Mayo system, there were 52% good-to-excellent results, 19% fair results, and 29% poor results a mean of 4.25 years after revision. A modification of the roentgenographic rating system would apply the Mayo hip score to noncemented total hip arthroplasties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3971612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  A scoring system to determine radiological loosening in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D M Dall; I D Learmonth; M Solomon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Authors:  Eric J Yue; Miguel E Cabanela; Gavan P Duffy; Michael G Heckman; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Reliability and validity of clinical outcome measurements of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee--a review of the literature.

Authors:  Y Sun; T Stürmer; K P Günther; H Brenner
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maik Hoberg; Christian Konrads; Jana Engelien; Dorothee Oschmann; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Patient-level clinically meaningful improvements in activities of daily living and pain after total hip arthroplasty: data from a large US institutional registry.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  THE CLINICAL, FUNCTIONAL AND BIOMECHANICAL PRESENTATION OF PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HIP ABDUCTOR TENDON TEARS.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Theertha Retheesh; Rinky Mutreja; Gregory C Janes
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10

7.  [Acetabular revision surgery with the oblong revision cup : clinical and radiological results of 217 cases].

Authors:  S Fickert; S Pfeiffer; A Walter; K P Günther; W-C Witzleb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Predictors of pain and use of pain medications following primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): 5,707 THAs at 2-years and 3,289 THAs at 5-years.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David Lewallen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  [Surgical hip dislocation : Current status in the treatment of femoral acetabular impingement].

Authors:  F Sitterlee; S Kirschbaum; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Treatment of proximal femur infections with antibiotic-loaded cement spacers.

Authors:  J Kelm; P Bohrer; E Schmitt; K Anagnostakos
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.