Literature DB >> 28180913

[Surgical hip dislocation : Current status in the treatment of femoral acetabular impingement].

F Sitterlee1, S Kirschbaum2, C Perka2, M Müller3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical hip dislocation (SHD) in the therapy of femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) has been mostly replaced by minimally invasive techniques. Nevertheless, in the circumstances of complex FAI types and combined impingement located in inaccessible areas of the hip, SHD is an option to reach those deformities. The advantage of the complete overview of the hip joint enables the circumferential therapy of bony deformity, but at the expense of higher invasivity. In the literature there is still a lack of mid to long-term studies of SHD to determine the overall treatment outcome. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcome, risks and complications of SHD in FAI therapy within a mid-term follow-up.
METHODS: A total of 43 patients (mean follow-up 54 months.) with combined ventral and dorsal impingement who undertook SHD were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome parameters were range of motion (ROM), the Harris hip score (HHS), the hip outcome score (HOS), the activity level, pain, complications, conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and patient specific surveys. Additionally, radiographs and the influence of preoperative osteoarthrosis were evaluated.
RESULTS: We were able to demonstrate a significant increase of ROM, HHS (69 → 80 Pkt.; p < 0.05), hip function and a decrease in pain level. The return to sport rate was 81%, but in most cases the patients had to reduce the intensity or change to a low impact sport activity. Overall, 75% were satisfied with the treatment outcome. The alpha angle improved from 70 to 45° (p < 0.05). Patients with preoperatively advanced hip osteoarthrosis showed no decent improvement of hip function. Conversion to THA was necessary in 36% of cases. The complication rate was about 13%.
CONCLUSION: SHD is successful in the treatment of combined ventral and dorsal impingement within a mid-term follow-up. The improvement of hip function and the reduction of pain symptoms is possible. In case of a manifest arthrosis an indication for SHD is no longer reasonable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip joint; Osteoarthritis of hip; Outcome; Surgical hip dislocation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28180913     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3394-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  34 in total

1.  Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis.

Authors:  R Ganz; T J Gill; E Gautier; K Ganz; N Krügel; U Berlemann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

2.  Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: what are the limits of hip arthroscopy?

Authors:  Ira Zaltz; Bryan T Kelly; Christopher M Larson; Michael Leunig; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Surgical hip dislocation for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: factors predicting 5-year survivorship.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Carmen Huemmer; Joseph M Schwab; Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients aged 50 years or older.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Bruno G Schroder E Souza; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Hip stability after ligamentum teres resection during surgical dislocation for cam impingement.

Authors:  Alistair R Phillips; Gavin Bartlett; Mark Norton; Darren Fern
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Surgical hip dislocation for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in high-level athletes.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Hermes H Miozzari; Tobias F Wyss; Hubert P Nötzli
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Midterm results of surgical hip dislocation for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Hermes H Miozzari; Michael Schär; Tobias Hesper; Hubert P Nötzli
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Surgery for femoroacetabular impingement using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach: analysis of 118 cases at 2.2-year follow-up.

Authors:  P Chiron; A Espié; N Reina; E Cavaignac; F Molinier; J-M Laffosse
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.256

9.  Does the femoral cam lesion regrow after osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement? Two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Asheesh Gupta; John M Redmond; Christine E Stake; Nathan A Finch; Kevin F Dunne; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Pros and cons of surgical hip dislocation for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Lisa M Tibor; Ernest L Sink
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Femoral neck stress fractures and femoroacetabular impingement : A retrospective case study and literature review].

Authors:  Lea Franken; Jens Goronzy; O O Olusile; Pablo Ariel Slullitel; Sophia Blum; Jörg Nowotny; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.