Literature DB >> 3958339

Reproducibility of arrhythmia induction with intracardiac electrophysiologic testing: patients with clinical sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

P J Kudenchuk, J Kron, C G Walance, E S Murphy, C D Morris, K K Griffith, J H McAnulty.   

Abstract

In order to characterize the day to day reproducibility of arrhythmias provoked during electrophysiologic stimulation, 114 patients with documented sustained clinical ventricular tachyarrhythmias were studied. Two baseline electrophysiologic tests were performed in the drug-free state and within 6 to 24 hours of one another. There was a significant increment (p less than or equal to 0.02) in the induction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias as the number of programmed extrastimuli increased from one (10% induction) to four (64% induction). Provoked arrhythmias were observed to be more frequently nonreproducible (as reflected in a major change in rate or duration, or both, of an induced ventricular arrhythmia between baseline tests) as the number of extrastimuli increased from one (7%) to four (27%). Nonreproducibility with three and four extrastimuli was not significantly greater than when two extrastimuli were utilized. Electrophysiology-directed drug trials should be interpreted in light of this observed variability in induced arrhythmias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3958339     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80342-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  Prospective clinical evaluation of a programmed atrial stimulation protocol for induction of sustained atrial fibrillation and flutter.

Authors:  R B Krol; S Saksena; A Prakash; I Giorgberidze; P Mathew
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Prognostic significance of programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A K Bhandari; R Hong; A Kotlewski; N McIntosh; P Au; A Sankoorikal; S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-05

3.  Factors likely to affect the long-term results of ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Beatrice Brembilla-Perrot; Pierre Yves Zinzius; Laurent Groben; Luc Freysz; Lucian Muresan; Jerome Schwartz; Raphael P Martins; Soumaya Jarmouni; Ibrahim Nossier; Nicolas Sadoul; Hugues Blangy; Arnaud Terrier De La Chaise; Pierre Louis; Olivier Selton; Daniel Beurrier; Jean Marc Sellal
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-04-01

4.  Sudden death prediction by programmed electrical stimulation following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Kron; C K Li; E Murphy; D Broudy; C Morris; K Griffith; J H McAnulty
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1986-11

5.  A Reproducible Protocol to Assess Arrhythmia Vulnerability in silico: Pacing at the End of the Effective Refractory Period.

Authors:  Luca Azzolin; Steffen Schuler; Olaf Dössel; Axel Loewe
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.