Literature DB >> 3798912

Sudden death prediction by programmed electrical stimulation following myocardial infarction.

J Kron, C K Li, E Murphy, D Broudy, C Morris, K Griffith, J H McAnulty.   

Abstract

To determine prospectively whether electrophysiologic testing is prognostically useful following a myocardial infarction, 38 patients were studied. Ventricular tachycardia was induced in 32 of 38 (84%) patients (sustained in 12) and was significantly increased with the use of three or four extrastimuli. In 17 months' mean follow-up, 4 patients died suddenly or survived an episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Programmed ventricular stimulation was a sensitive but not a specific predictor of these events with an overall 24% predictive accuracy. The use of one or two extrastimuli substantially improved specificity but was insensitive in predicting sudden death or ventricular tachycardia. Programmed ventricular stimulation soon after uncomplicated myocardial infarction was not a useful prognostic indicator for sudden death or subsequent ventricular tachycardia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3798912      PMCID: PMC1307107     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  23 in total

1.  The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man.

Authors:  H Sandler; H T Dodge
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Unresolved problems in coronary care.

Authors:  B Lown; C Vasaux; W B Hood; A M Fakhro; E Kaplinsky; G Roberge
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Prediction of sudden death and spontaneous ventricular tachycardia in survivors of complicated myocardial infarction: value of the response to programmed stimulation using a maximum of three ventricular extrastimuli.

Authors:  L E Waspe; D Seinfeld; A Ferrick; S G Kim; J A Matos; J D Fisher
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of an acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D Roy; E Marchand; P Théroux; D D Waters; G B Pelletier; M G Bourassa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Prevention of recurrent sudden cardiac arrest: role of provocative electropharmacologic testing.

Authors:  D G Benditt; D W Benson; G J Klein; M R Pritzker; J M Kriett; R W Anderson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Programmed electrical stimulation of the heart in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias: what is the significance of induced arrhythmias and what is the correct stimulation protocol?

Authors:  H J Wellens; P Brugada; W G Stevenson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J T Bigger; C A Heller; T L Wenger; F M Weld
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Identifying patients at risk of sudden death after myocardial infarction: value of the response to programmed stimulation, degree of ventricular ectopic activity and severity of left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  F E Marchlinski; A E Buxton; H L Waxman; M E Josephson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Reproducibility of arrhythmia induction with intracardiac electrophysiologic testing: patients with clinical sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Authors:  P J Kudenchuk; J Kron; C G Walance; E S Murphy; C D Morris; K K Griffith; J H McAnulty
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Value of programmed stimulation and exercise testing in predicting one-year mortality after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A R Denniss; H Baaijens; D V Cody; D A Richards; P A Russell; A A Young; D L Ross; J B Uther
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.