Literature DB >> 3957011

Selection for increased mutation rates with fertility differences between matings.

K E Holsinger, M W Feldman, L Altenberg.   

Abstract

Previous studies of mutation modification have considered models in which selection is a result of viability differences that are sex symmetric. The results of a numerical study of a model in which selection is a result of fertility differences between mated pairs demonstrate that the type of selection to which a population is subject can have a significant impact on the evolution of various parameters of the genetic system. When the fertility of matings between individuals with different genotypes exceeds the fertility of at least some of the matings between individuals with the same genotype, selection may favor increased rates of mutation, in contrast to the results from all existing constant viability models with random mating and infinite population size. Increased mutation rates are most frequently favored when forward and back mutation occur at approximately equal rates and when the modifying locus is loosely linked to the selected locus. We present one example in which selection favors increased rates of mutation even though the selection scheme is reducible to one of differential viability between the sexes.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3957011      PMCID: PMC1202785     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  7 in total

1.  Stochastic selection in large and small populations.

Authors:  R D Cook
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  The regulation of recombination in plants.

Authors:  V GRANT
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1958

3.  Differential Fertility in Population Genetics Models.

Authors:  W F Bodmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  With selection for fecundity the mean fitness does not necessarily increase.

Authors:  E Pollak
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Selection for recombination in partially self-fertilizing populations.

Authors:  D Charlesworth; B Charlesworth; C Strobeck
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive. I. The solution of a special case and some general implications.

Authors:  T Prout; J Bundgaard; S Bryant
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  [Clinical evaluation of a computer for ECG surveillance].

Authors:  I Christiansen; J Badskjaer; E O Jørgensen; S Larsen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1980-07-28
  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations.

Authors:  T Johnson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution of mutation rates: phylogenomic analysis of the photolyase/cryptochrome family.

Authors:  José Ignacio Lucas-Lledó; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Unified reduction principle for the evolution of mutation, migration, and recombination.

Authors:  Lee Altenberg; Uri Liberman; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selection, generalized transmission and the evolution of modifier genes. I. The reduction principle.

Authors:  L Altenberg; M W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Sequence-dependent gene conversion: can duplicated genes diverge fast enough to escape conversion?

Authors:  J B Walsh
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolution of epigenetic transmission when selection acts on fecundity versus viability.

Authors:  Bram Kuijper; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.