Literature DB >> 33866808

Evolution of epigenetic transmission when selection acts on fecundity versus viability.

Bram Kuijper1, Rufus A Johnstone2.   

Abstract

Existing theory on the evolution of parental effects and the inheritance of non-genetic factors has mostly focused on the role of environmental change. By contrast, how differences in population demography and life history affect parental effects is poorly understood. To fill this gap, we develop an analytical model to explore how parental effects evolve when selection acts on fecundity versus viability in spatio-temporally fluctuating environments. We find that regimes of viability selection, but not fecundity selection, are most likely to favour parental effects. In the case of viability selection, locally adapted phenotypes have a higher survival than maladapted phenotypes and hence become enriched in the local environment. Hence, simply by being alive, a parental phenotype becomes correlated to its environment (and hence informative to offspring) during its lifetime, favouring the evolution of parental effects. By contrast, in regimes of fecundity selection, correlations between phenotype and environment develop more slowly: this is because locally adapted and maladapted parents survive at equal rates (no survival selection), so that parental phenotypes, by themselves, are uninformative about the local environment. However, because locally adapted parents are more fecund, they contribute more offspring to the local patch than maladapted parents. In case these offspring are also likely to inherit the adapted parents' phenotypes (requiring pre-existing inheritance), locally adapted offspring become enriched in the local environment, resulting in a correlation between phenotype and environment, but only in the offspring's generation. Because of this slower build-up of a correlation between phenotype and environment essential to parental effects, fecundity selection is more sensitive to any distortions owing to environmental change than viability selection. Hence, we conclude that viability selection is most conducive to the evolution of parental effects. This article is part of the theme issue 'How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?'

Entities:  

Keywords:  environmental change; information; non-genetic inheritance; parental effects; phenotypic plasticity; transgenerational effects

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33866808      PMCID: PMC8059634          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.671


  64 in total

1.  The evolution of phenotypic polymorphism: randomized strategies versus evolutionary branching.

Authors:  Olof Leimar
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Natural selection on fecundity variance in subdivided populations: kin selection meets bet hedging.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; François Balloux
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evolution of stochastic switching rates in asymmetric fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Marcel Salathé; Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The evolution of unconditional strategies via the 'multiplier effect'.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Sasha R X Dall
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  How should parents adjust the size of their young in response to local environmental cues?

Authors:  B Kuijper; R A Johnstone
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  A model for the generation and transmission of variations in evolution.

Authors:  Olivier Rivoire; Stanislas Leibler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Detection vs. selection: integration of genetic, epigenetic and environmental cues in fluctuating environments.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Sasha R X Dall; Peter Hammerstein; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 8.  The transition to modernity and chronic disease: mismatch and natural selection.

Authors:  Stephen Corbett; Alexandre Courtiol; Virpi Lummaa; Jacob Moorad; Stephen Stearns
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  The adaptive advantage of phenotypic memory in changing environments.

Authors:  E Jablonka; B Oborny; I Molnár; E Kisdi; J Hofbauer; T Czárán
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1995-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Intergenerational and transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in animals.

Authors:  Marcos Francisco Perez; Ben Lehner
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  1 in total

1.  How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?

Authors:  Alyson Ashe; Vincent Colot; Benjamin P Oldroyd
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.