Literature DB >> 2743857

Visual field in hysteria-reliability of visual field by Goldmann perimetry.

H Ohkubo1.   

Abstract

Four cases with hysterical amblyopia in youngsters under 15-year-old showed the poor reproducibility of visual field, that is, when the same target was moved from the periphery toward the fixation ten times along the same meridian during the same examination, the position of the plotted points were rather variable. The range of variation was measured from the innermost point to the outermost one, after the two first points were omitted because points first detected were usually far from the others. The variation of cases measured by this method was compared with that of normal persons. Results were as follows; 1. in normal person, the mean value of its range was 5.5 degrees in first decade and 4.2 degrees in second to seventh decade; 2. patients with psychogenic visual disturbances showed a variability of 14.2 degrees, and this was significantly different from normal (p less than 0.01). These results suggest that this convenient method was helpful for diagnosis of hysteria. It should also be remembered that when we evaluate the visual field, changes under 4 degrees are probably not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2743857     DOI: 10.1007/bf00155133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  9 in total

1.  Hysterical amblyopia; statistical analysis of forty-two cases found in a survey of eight hundred unselected eye patients at a state medical center.

Authors:  T F SCHLAEGEL; F V QUILALA
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1955-12

2.  Hysterical amblyopia in children and young adults.

Authors:  E R YASUNA
Journal:  AMA Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1951-01

3.  [Kinetic and static perimetries in young children (author's transl)].

Authors:  F Liao
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1973-09

4.  The visual evoked response in hysterical amblyopia.

Authors:  J Behrman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.

Authors:  O Kosoko; A Sommer; C Auer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03

6.  Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers.

Authors:  R K Parrish; J Schiffman; D R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-10

7.  [Morphometric study of the quantitative kinetic perimetry (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Hamada; F Furuno; H Matsuo
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1981-10-10

8.  Retinal function studies in hysterical amblyopia. A unique abnormality of dark adaptation.

Authors:  A E Krill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Age-related changes of the normal visual field.

Authors:  G J Jaffe; J A Alvarado; R P Juster
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-07
  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Non-organic visual loss.

Authors:  S Beatty
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  [Testing and approach when non-organic visual loss is suspected].

Authors:  Anna Sophie Mursch-Edlmayr; D Mojon; M Bolz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.