Literature DB >> 8457400

Incidence and prognosis of congenital aortic valve stenosis in Liverpool (1960-1990).

D J Kitchiner1, M Jackson, K Walsh, I Peart, R Arnold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and prognosis of congenital aortic valve stenosis in the five Health Districts of Liverpool that make up the Merseyside area.
DESIGN: The records of the Liverpool Congenital Malformations Registry and the Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital identified 239 patients (155 male, 84 female) born with aortic valve stenosis between 1960 and 1990. Patients were traced to assess the severity of stenosis at follow up. Information on the severity at presentation and all subsequent events was obtained.
RESULTS: Congenital aortic valve stenosis occurred in 5.7% of patients with congenital heart disease born in the Merseyside area. The median age at presentation was 16 months (range 0-20 years). Stenosis was mild at presentation in 145 patients, moderate in 33, severe in one and critical in 21 and 39 had a bicuspid valve without stenosis. Additional cardiac lesions were significantly more common in children presenting under one year of age and in those with critical stenosis. The median duration of follow up was 9.2 years (range 1-28 years) and seven patients were lost to follow up. 81 operations were performed in 60 patients. The reoperation rate was 28.3% after a median duration of 8.7 years (range 2.5-18 years). 15% of patients who presented with mild stenosis subsequently required operation compared with 67% of those with moderate stenosis. There were no sudden unexpected deaths and no deaths after aortic valvotomy, except in those presenting with critical stenosis. Mortality was 16.7% but patients presenting with critical aortic stenosis had a much worse prognosis. Actuarial and hazard analysis showed that the survival and absence of serious events (aortic valve surgery or balloon dilatation, endocarditis, or death) were significantly better in patients who presented with mild aortic stenosis than in those who presented with moderate aortic stenosis. 75% of patients presenting with mild stenosis had not progressed to moderate stenosis after 10 years of follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: Congenital aortic valve stenosis may be progressive even when it is mild at presentation. Patients presenting with mild stenosis, however, have a significantly better prognosis than those presenting with moderate stenosis. An accurate clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the severity of aortic valve stenosis at presentation provides a good guide to prognosis into early adult life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8457400      PMCID: PMC1024922          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.69.1.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  40 in total

1.  Natural history of moderate aortic stenosis.

Authors:  K D Kennedy; R A Nishimura; D R Holmes; K R Bailey
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Late results of aortic valvotomy for congenital valvar aortic stenosis.

Authors:  D A DeBoer; R C Robbins; B J Maron; C L McIntosh; R E Clark
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Balloon aortic valvuloplasty: results of the Valvuloplasty and Angioplasty of Congenital Anomalies Registry.

Authors:  A P Rocchini; R H Beekman; G Ben Shachar; L Benson; D Schwartz; J S Kan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Neonatal aortic stenosis.

Authors:  K Turley; E L Bove; J J Amato; M Iannettoni; J Yeh; J V Cotroneo; R J Galdieri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Valvar stenosis: a comparison of clinical assessment, echocardiography, Doppler ultrasound and catheterisation.

Authors:  O Odemuyiwa; J P Bourke; I Peart; M Been; A Heads; R J Hall
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Determination of severity of valvular aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography and relation of findings to clinical outcome and agreement with hemodynamic measurements determined at cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  A Galan; W A Zoghbi; M A Quiñones
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Critical aortic stenosis in the first month of life: surgical results in 26 infants.

Authors:  T R Karl; S Sano; W J Brawn; R B Mee
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Doppler echocardiography in aortic stenosis: feasibility and clinical impact.

Authors:  C Shub; A J Tajik; D R Holmes; G S Reeder; W K Freeman; D M Ilstrup; H C Smith
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Results of operation for aortic valve stenosis in infants, children, and adolescents.

Authors:  J J Wheller; D M Hosier; D W Teske; J M Craenen; J W Kilman
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Balloon dilatation of the aortic valve for congenital aortic stenosis in childhood.

Authors:  I D Sullivan; C Wren; H Bain; S Hunter; P G Rees; J F Taylor; C Bull; J E Deanfield
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-02
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  C Ward
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Survival with congenital heart disease and need for follow up in adult life.

Authors:  C Wren; J J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Prognosis of supravalve aortic stenosis in 81 patients in Liverpool (1960-1993).

Authors:  D Kitchiner; M Jackson; K Walsh; I Peart; R Arnold
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Incidence and prognosis of obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract in Liverpool (1960-91): a study of 313 patients.

Authors:  D Kitchiner; M Jackson; N Malaiya; K Walsh; I Peart; R Arnold
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-06

5.  Contemporary results of balloon valvuloplasty and surgical valvotomy for congenital aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M A Gatzoulis; M L Rigby; E A Shinebourne; A N Redington
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.791

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.