Literature DB >> 29679256

Biomechanical features of six design of the delta external fixator for treating Pilon fracture: a finite element study.

Muhammad Hanif Ramlee1,2, Mohd Ayub Sulong3,4, Evelyn Garcia-Nieto5, Daniel Angure Penaranda5, Antonio Ros Felip5, Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir6,3.   

Abstract

Pilon fractures can be caused by high-energy vertical forces which may result in long-term patient immobilization. Many experts in orthopedic surgery recommend the use of a Delta external fixator for type III Pilon fracture treatment. This device can promote immediate healing of fractured bone, minimizing the rate of complications as well as allowing early mobilization. The characteristics of different types of the Delta frame have not been demonstrated yet. By using the finite element method, this study was conducted to determine the biomechanical characteristics of six different configurations (Model 1 until Model 6). CT images from the lower limb of a healthy human were used to reconstruct three-dimensional models of foot and ankle bones. All bones were assigned with isotropic material properties and the cartilages were assigned to exhibit hyperelasticity. A linear link was used to simulate 37 ligaments at the ankle joint. Axial loads of 70 and 350 N were applied at the proximal tibia to simulate the stance and swing phase. The metatarsals and calcaneus were fixed distally in order to prevent rigid body motion. A synthetic ankle bone was used to validate the finite element model. The simulated results showed that Delta3 produced the highest relative micromovement (0.09 mm, 7 μm) during the stance and swing phase, respectively. The highest equivalent von Mises stress was found at the calcaneus pin of the Delta4 (423.2 MPa) as compared to others. In conclusion, Delta1 external fixator was the most favorable option for type III Pilon fracture treatment. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Delta external fixator; Finite element; Micromovement; Pilon fractures; Synthetic bone

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29679256     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1830-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  87 in total

1.  The effect of movement on the holding power of screws in bone.

Authors:  J Schatzker; J G Horne; G Sumner-Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does screw-bone interface modelling matter in finite element analyses?

Authors:  Alisdair R MacLeod; Pankaj Pankaj; A Hamish R W Simpson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Mechanical and functional assessment of the wrist affected by rheumatoid arthritis: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  M N Bajuri; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Murali Malliga Raman; T Kamarul
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses.

Authors:  Vaclav Baca; Zdenek Horak; Petr Mikulenka; Valer Dzupa
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Intravoxel bone micromechanics for microCT-based finite element simulations.

Authors:  Romane Blanchard; Alexander Dejaco; Evi Bongaers; Christian Hellmich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Mechanical induction of critically delayed bone healing in sheep: radiological and biomechanical results.

Authors:  Hanna Schell; Mark S Thompson; Hermann J Bail; Jan-Erik Hoffmann; Alexander Schill; Georg N Duda; Jasmin Lienau
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Computational modelling of long bone fractures fixed with locking plates - How can the risk of implant failure be reduced?

Authors:  M Nassiri; B Macdonald; J M O'Byrne
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2013-03-07

8.  The operative treatment of intra-articular fractures of the lower end of the tibia.

Authors:  T P Rüedi; M Allgöwer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Tibial plafond fractures: limited incision reduction with percutaneous fixation.

Authors:  Heather L Salton; Shannon Rush; John Schuberth
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.286

10.  Biomechanical properties of an intact, injured, repaired, and healed femur: an experimental and computational study.

Authors:  Hamid Ebrahimi; Mikhail Rabinovich; Viktor Vuleta; Daniel Zalcman; Suraj Shah; Anton Dubov; Kavya Roy; Faisal Sharaf Siddiqui; Emil H Schemitsch; Habiba Bougherara; Rad Zdero
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-09-20
View more
  2 in total

1.  Configuration design and correction ability evaluation of a novel external fixator for foot and ankle deformity treated by U osteotomy.

Authors:  Shiping Zuo; Mingjie Dong; Jianfeng Li; Chunjing Tao; Run Ji
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Identification of risk factors for surgical site infection after type II and type III tibial pilon fracture surgery.

Authors:  Hao Hu; Jian Zhang; Xue-Guan Xie; Yan-Kun Dai; Xu Huang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.