Literature DB >> 3949979

Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks.

P S Chen, N Shibata, E G Dixon, P D Wolf, N D Danieley, M B Sweeney, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that a defibrillation shock is unsuccessful because it fails to annihilate activation fronts within a critical mass of myocardium, we recorded epicardial and transmural activation in 11 open-chest dogs during electrically induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). Shocks of 1-30 J were delivered through defibrillation electrodes on the left ventricular apex and right atrium. Simultaneous recordings were made from septal, intramural, and epicardial electrodes in various combinations. Immediately after all 104 unsuccessful and 116 successful defibrillation shocks, an isoelectric interval much longer than that observed during preshock VF occurred. During this time no epicardial, septal, or intramural activations were observed. This isoelectric window averaged 64 +/- 22 ms after unsuccessful defibrillation and 339 +/- 292 ms after successful defibrillation (P less than 0.02). After the isoelectric window of unsuccessful shocks, earliest activation was recorded from the base of the ventricles, which was the area farthest from the apical defibrillation electrode. Activation was synchronized for one or two cycles following unsuccessful shocks, after which VF regenerated. Thus, after both successful and unsuccessful defibrillation with epicardial shocks of greater than or equal to 1 J, an isoelectric window occurs during which no activation fronts are present; the postshock isoelectric window is shorter for unsuccessful than for successful defibrillation; unsuccessful shocks transiently synchronize activation before fibrillation regenerates; activation leading to the regeneration of VF after the isoelectric window for unsuccessful shocks originates in areas away from the defibrillation electrodes. The isoelectric window does not support the hypothesis that defibrillation fails solely because activation fronts are not halted within a critical mass of myocardium. Rather, unsuccessful epicardial shocks of greater than or equal to 1 J halt all activation fronts after which VF regenerates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3949979      PMCID: PMC423467          DOI: 10.1172/JCI112378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  32 in total

1.  Closed chest defibrillation of the heart.

Authors:  W B KOUWENHOVEN; W R MILNOR; G G KNICKERBOCKER; W R CHESNUT
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  The excitability cycle of the dog's left ventricle determined by anodal, cathodal, and bipolar stimulation.

Authors:  R T VAN DAM; D DURRER; J STRACKEE; L H VAN DER TWEEL
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Vulnerability to fibrillation and the ventricular-excitability curve.

Authors:  B F HOFFMAN; E F GORIN; F S WAX; A A SIEBENS; C M BROOKS
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1951-10

4.  Circus movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of tachycardia. III. The "leading circle" concept: a new model of circus movement in cardiac tissue without the involvement of an anatomical obstacle.

Authors:  M A Allessie; F I Bonke; F J Schopman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  Computer techniques for epicardial and endocardial mapping.

Authors:  W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

6.  Termination of malignant ventricular arrhythmias with an implanted automatic defibrillator in human beings.

Authors:  M Mirowski; P R Reid; M M Mower; L Watkins; V L Gott; J F Schauble; A Langer; M S Heilman; S A Kolenik; R E Fischell; M L Weisfeldt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A system for the parametric description of the ventricular surface of the heart.

Authors:  F R Bartram; R E Ideker; W M Smith
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1981-12

8.  Development of an endocardial-epicardial gradient of activation rate during electrically induced, sustained ventricular fibrillation in dogs.

Authors:  S J Worley; J L Swain; P G Colavita; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1985-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Effect of pentobarbital anesthesia on ventricular defibrillation threshold in dogs.

Authors:  C F Babbs
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Local potential gradients as a unifying measure for thresholds of stimulation, standstill, tachyarrhythmia and fibrillation appearing after strong capacitor discharges.

Authors:  E Lepeschkin; J L Jones; S Rush; R E Jones
Journal:  Adv Cardiol       Date:  1978
View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of defibrillation.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Vladimir G Fast; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 2.  Modeling defibrillation of the heart: approaches and insights.

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova; Jason Constantino; Takashi Ashihara; Gernot Plank
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011

3.  Differences between left and right ventricular chamber geometry affect cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Authors:  Blanca Rodríguez; Li Li; James C Eason; Igor R Efimov; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Transmural and endocardial Purkinje activation in pigs before local myocardial activation after defibrillation shocks.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Kang-An Cheng; Jian Huang; J Scott Allison; James D Allred; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Drawing the curtain on the isoelectric window?

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 6.  The role of transmural ventricular heterogeneities in cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Authors:  Thushka Maharaj; Robert Blake; Natalia Trayanova; David Gavaghan; Blanca Rodriguez
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Tunnel propagation of postshock activations as a hypothesis for fibrillation induction and isoelectric window.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Jason Constantino; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Arrhythmogenic mechanisms of the Purkinje system during electric shocks: a modeling study.

Authors:  Makarand Deo; Patrick Boyle; Gernot Plank; Edward Vigmond
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  The effect of pinacidil on postshock activation and ventricular defibrillation threshold in canine hearts.

Authors:  Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Jian Zhou; Chang-jian Lin; Yang Pang; Gang Gu; Wei-feng Shen; Li-Qun Wu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Transmural recording of shock potential gradient fields, early postshock activations, and refibrillation episodes associated with external defibrillation of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in swine.

Authors:  James D Allred; Cheryl R Killingsworth; J Scott Allison; Derek J Dosdall; Sharon B Melnick; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker; Gregory P Walcott
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.