Literature DB >> 3944861

Comparison of recurrent varicocele anatomy following surgery and percutaneous balloon occlusion.

R R Murray, S E Mitchell, S Kadir, S L Kaufman, R Chang, M L Kinnison, J W Smyth, R I White.   

Abstract

Venography of 44 recurrent varicoceles in 37 patients demonstrated different anatomical patterns of recurrence in surgical patients (26) compared to those treated by percutaneous balloon occlusion (18). The 3 types of patterns identified included parallel, renal vein and transcrotal collateral pathways. Virtually all surgical recurrences were owing to mid retroperitoneal (27 per cent) or low (inguinal) parallel collaterals (58 per cent). The majority of post-balloon occlusion recurrences were due to either high retroperitoneal parallel (44 per cent) or renal vein collaterals (28 per cent). Surgical recurrences were treated easily with percutaneous balloon occlusion. However, 39 per cent of the patients with recurrences following balloon embolization were not anatomical candidates for repeat percutaneous occlusion. We conclude that venous collaterals are identified easily by renal venography, and knowledge of these collaterals is helpful in planning further surgical or radiological treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3944861     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45615-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of inguinal and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of varicocele.

Authors:  V Ulker; H Garibyan; K H Kurth
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Dr. Zini's rebuttal.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Varicocelectomy: microsurgical subinguinal technique is the treatment of choice.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: what's the intraoperative difference?

Authors:  Xiaopeng Liu; Hao Zhang; Xingxing Ruan; Hengjun Xiao; Wentao Huang; Liaoyuan Li; Xin Gao; Yan Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Low inguinal approach for correction of recurrent varicocele.

Authors:  S Madjar; B Moskovitz; E Issaq; M Weinberger; O Nativ
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Laparoscopic ligation of varicoceles: an anatomically superior operation.

Authors:  G Humphrey; A Najmaldin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopic procedures: left varicocele embolization as a model.

Authors:  Anthony G Verstandig; Bashar Shamieh; Vladimir Shraibman; David Raveh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Practice Pattern of Redo Varicocelectomy for Recurrent Varicocele according to Type of Initial Treatment: Retrospective Analysis of a United States-Based Insurance Claims Database.

Authors:  Hyoung Keun Park; Gyeong Eun Min; Kyung Jin Chung; Shufeng Li; Woo Suk Choi; Benjamin I Chung
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.400

9.  Recurrent varicoceles: causes and treatment using angiography and magnification assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Kyung Hyun Moon; Suk Ju Cho; Kun Suk Kim; Seonghun Park; Sungchan Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Outcome of Loupe-Assisted Sub-inguinal Varicocelectomy in Infertile Men.

Authors:  Selim S Abdelrahman; Bayoumy I Eassa
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2012-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.