Literature DB >> 9203041

Comparison of inguinal and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of varicocele.

V Ulker1, H Garibyan, K H Kurth.   

Abstract

To determine the pros and cons of inguinal and laparoscopic varix ligation techniques, we reviewed 53 patients who underwent inguinal (n = 35) and laparoscopic (n = 18) varicocelectomy at two centers. Intraoperative complications were not observed in either of the groups. There was 1 recurrence and 1 persistence in the laparoscopically treated patients. The inguinal approach had the advantage of shorter operating time (19.1 versus 52.8 min), ability to ligate the external spermatic veins, and it could be performed as an outpatient procedure. However, the laparoscopic approach seemed superior for preserving the spermatic artery (88.8% versus 68.5%) and had lesser postoperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9203041     DOI: 10.1007/bf02551420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  19 in total

1.  Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique; preliminary report.

Authors:  A PALOMO
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Effectiveness of laparoscopic varicocelectomy.

Authors:  J P Jarow; D G Assimos; D E Pittaway
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Mechanisms of recurrent varicocele after balloon occlusion or surgical ligation of the internal spermatic vein.

Authors:  S L Kaufman; S Kadir; K H Barth; J W Smyth; P C Walsh; R I White
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A new entity in varicocele subfertility: the "cremasteric reflux".

Authors:  J Sayfan; Y G Adam; Y Soffer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Varicocelectomy: 986 cases in a twelve-year study.

Authors:  L Dubin; R D Amelar
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Laparoscopic versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  E Enquist; B S Stein; M Sigman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Laparoscopic varicocele ligation.

Authors:  D J Ralph; A G Timoney; C Parker; J P Pryor
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-08

8.  Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a simple technique for clip ligation of the spermatic vessels.

Authors:  T Matsuda; Y Horii; S Higashi; K Oishi; H Takeuchi; O Yoshida
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of recurrent varicocele anatomy following surgery and percutaneous balloon occlusion.

Authors:  R R Murray; S E Mitchell; S Kadir; S L Kaufman; R Chang; M L Kinnison; J W Smyth; R I White
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  [Varicocele of the testis. A comparison between laparoscopic and conventional surgery].

Authors:  E U Poulsen; H Willumsen; H Colstrup; K M Jensen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1994-09-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Current management of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  D A Paduch; S J Skoog
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

2.  Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain.

Authors:  Stefanos Kachrilas; Elenko Popov; Andreas Bourdoumis; Waseem Akhter; Mohamed El Howairis; Ismaeel Aghaways; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Comparison of The Efficacy and Safety of Palomo, Ivanissevich and Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy in Iranian Infertile Men with Palpable Varicocele.

Authors:  Kamal Hosseini; Masoumeh Nejatifar; Ali Kabir
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-01-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.