Literature DB >> 3912515

DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning.

H R Drew, A A Travers.   

Abstract

X-ray and solution studies have shown that the conformation of a DNA double helix depends strongly on its base sequence. Here we show that certain sequence-dependent modulations in structure appear to determine the rotational positioning of DNA about the nucleosome. Three different experiments are described. First, a piece of DNA of defined sequence (169 base-pairs long) is closed into a circle, and its structure examined by digestion with DNAase I: the helix adopts a highly preferred configuration, with short runs of (A, T) facing in and runs of (G, C) facing out. Secondly, the same sequence is reconstituted with a histone octamer: the angular orientation around the histone core remains conserved, apart from a small uniform increase in helix twist. Finally, it is shown that the average sequence content of DNA molecules isolated from chicken nucleosome cores is non-random, as in a reconstituted nucleosome: short runs of (A, T) are preferentially positioned with minor grooves facing in, while runs of (G, C) tend to have their minor grooves facing out. The periodicity of this modulation in sequence content (10.17 base-pairs) corresponds to the helix twist in a local frame of reference (a result that bears on the change in linking number upon nucleosome formation). The determinants of translational positioning have not been identified, but one possibility is that long runs of homopolymer (dA) X (dT) or (dG) X (dC) will be excluded from the central region of the supercoil on account of their resistance to curvature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3912515     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90396-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  219 in total

1.  Sequence-dependent dynamics in duplex DNA.

Authors:  T M Okonogi; S C Alley; A W Reese; P B Hopkins; B H Robinson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Optimization of nucleic acid sequences.

Authors:  I Lafontaine; R Lavery
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A theoretical model for the prediction of sequence-dependent nucleosome thermodynamic stability.

Authors:  C Anselmi; G Bocchinfuso; P De Santis; M Savino; A Scipioni
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Protein-induced bending and DNA cyclization.

Authors:  J D Kahn; D M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Organization of specific DNA sequence elements in the region of the replication origin and matrix attachment site in the chicken alpha-globin gene domain.

Authors:  W A Krajewski; S V Razin
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1992-11

6.  Predicting indirect readout effects in protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Yongli Zhang; Zhiqun Xi; Rashmi S Hegde; Zippora Shakked; Donald M Crothers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A determining influence for CpG dinucleotides on nucleosome positioning in vitro.

Authors:  Colin S Davey; Sari Pennings; Carmel Reilly; Richard R Meehan; James Allan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Regulation of V(D)J recombination by nucleosome positioning at recombination signal sequences.

Authors:  Matthias Baumann; Adamantios Mamais; Fraser McBlane; Hua Xiao; Joan Boyes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  The leucine-responsive regulatory protein, a global regulator of metabolism in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J M Calvo; R G Matthews
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-09

10.  Echinomycin and distamycin induce rotation of nucleosome core DNA.

Authors:  C M Low; H R Drew; M J Waring
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.