Literature DB >> 3909451

Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine.

T Itoh, H Tsuji.   

Abstract

The laminoplasty reported in Spine 1982 by the author (H.T.) was modified by a technical improvement to obtain a more reliable enlargement of the cervical spinal canal. The technical improvements and results are described in detail. The osteotomized laminae that floated en bloc like a hinged door must be stabilized by bone blocks with wire ligatures. Thirty patients with severe cervical myelopathy due to multisegmental spondylosis or ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament underwent surgery. The extent of the enlargement of the canal was 4.1 mm on the average in the anteroposterior diameter, and in no case was a significant reduction in the diameter of the canal noted during the follow-up period. A stable and thorough decompression of the spinal canal was noted on the postoperative computed tomograms with satisfactory surgical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3909451     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198510000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  54 in total

1.  Cervical laminoplasty construct stability: an experimental and finite element investigation.

Authors:  Srinivas C Tadepalli; Anup A Gandhi; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicole M Grosland; Joseph Smucker
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2011

2.  Expansive lumbar laminoplasty for degenerative spinal stenosis in patients below 70 years of age.

Authors:  H Matsui; M Kanamori; H Ishihara; N Hirano; H Tsuji
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  C3-6 laminoplasty takes over C3-7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain.

Authors:  N Hosono; H Sakaura; Y Mukai; R Fujii; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis-results of expansive laminoplasty.

Authors:  S S Sangwan; Zile Singh Kundu; Pankaj Walecha; R C Siwach; Pradeep Kamboj; Raj Singh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Posterior approach to the degenerative cervical spine.

Authors:  Kazuo Yonenobu; Takenori Oda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Canal-expansive laminoplasty in 83 patients with cervical myelopathy. A comparative study of three different procedures.

Authors:  M Naito; K Ogata; S Kurose; M Oyama
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The effect of multi-level laminoplasty and laminectomy on the biomechanics of the cervical spine: a finite element study.

Authors:  Swathi Kode; Nicole A Kallemeyn; Joseph D Smucker; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicole M Grosland
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2014

8.  Impact of deep extensor muscle-preserving approach on clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Hideki Sudo; Masahiko Takahata; Ken Nagahama; Akira Iwata; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty: clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Hae Gi Park; Ho Yeol Zhang; Sang Hoon Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-09-30

10.  Minimum 2-year outcome of cervical laminoplasty with deep extensor muscle-preserving approach: impact on cervical spine function and quality of life.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Hideki Sudo; Masahiko Takahata; Shigeki Ohshima; Yoshihiro Hojo; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.