Literature DB >> 25328475

The effect of multi-level laminoplasty and laminectomy on the biomechanics of the cervical spine: a finite element study.

Swathi Kode1, Nicole A Kallemeyn1, Joseph D Smucker2, Douglas C Fredericks2, Nicole M Grosland3.   

Abstract

Laminectomy has been regarded as a standard treatment for multi-level cervical stenosis. Concern for complications such as kyphosis has limited the indication of multi-level laminectomy; hence it is often augmented with an instrumented fusion. Laminoplasty has emerged as a motion preserving alternative. The purpose of this study was to compare the multidirectional flexibility of the cervical spine in response to a plate-only open door laminoplasty, double door laminoplasty, and laminectomy using a computational model. A validated three-dimensional finite element model of a specimen-specific intact cervical spine (C2-T1) was modified to simulate each surgical procedure at levels C3-C6. An additional goal of this work was to compare the instrumented computational model to our multi-specimen experimental findings to ensure similar trends in response to the surgical procedures. Model predictions indicate that mobility was retained following open and double door laminoplasty with a 5.4% and 20% increase in flexion, respectively, compared to the intact state. Laminectomy resulted in 57% increase in flexion as compared to the intact state, creating a concern for eventual kyphosis--a known risk/complication of multi-level laminectomy in the absence of fusion. Increased disc stresses were observed at the altered and adjacent segments post-laminectomy in flexion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical spine; finite element; laminectomy; laminoplasty; miniplates; spacer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25328475      PMCID: PMC4127738     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  28 in total

Review 1.  Cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Michael P Steinmetz; Daniel K Resnick
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Clinical application of a new plate fixation system in open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Liangjun Jiang; Weishan Chen; Qixin Chen; Kan Xu; Qionghua Wu; Fangcai Li
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Level-dependent coronal and axial moment-rotation corridors of degeneration-free cervical spines in lateral flexion.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Frank A Pintar; Brian D Stemper; Christopher E Wolfla; Barry S Shender; Glenn Paskoff
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Finite element modeling of cervical laminectomy with graded facetectomy.

Authors:  S Kumaresan; N Yoganandan; F A Pintar; L M Voo; J F Cusick; S J Larson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1997-02

5.  A finite element investigation of upper cervical instrumentation.

Authors:  C M Puttlitz; V K Goel; V C Traynelis; C R Clark
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Seung-Chul Rhim; Sung-Woo Roh; Suk-Hyung Kang; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.

Authors:  John K Ratliff; Paul R Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of cervical double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacer.

Authors:  Shinichiro Kubo; Vijay K Goel; Seok-Jo Yang; Naoya Tajima
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Satomi; J Ogawa; Y Ishii; K Hirabayashi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Analysis of cervical spine curvature in patients with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  U Batzdorf; A Batzdorff
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  G Gargiulo; M Girardo; A Rava; A Coniglio; P Cinnella; A Massè; F Fusini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-08

2.  Biomechanical Analysis of the Cervical Spine Following Disc Degeneration, Disc Fusion, and Disc Replacement: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Anup A Gandhi; Nicole M Grosland; Nicole A Kallemeyn; Swathi Kode; Douglas C Fredericks; Joseph D Smucker
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31

3.  Incidence and predictors of kyphotic deformity following resection of cervical intradural tumors in adults: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Charles Tatter; Alexander Fletcher-Sandersjöö; Oscar Persson; Gustav Burström; Per Grane; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.216

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.