Literature DB >> 25346761

Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty: clinical and radiological outcomes.

Hae Gi Park1, Ho Yeol Zhang2, Sang Hoon Lee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty is a procedure that utilizes a Miniplate® or Maxpacer® to achieve maximal canal expansion. This method is expected to show much larger canal expansion and good clinical outcome. So we investigated the clinical and radiological outcome of Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty.
METHODS: Between June 2008 and July 2013, we performed cervical expansive laminoplasty in 87 and 48 patients using the Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty, respectively. We analyzed the clinical results of these operations using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system and by assessing the position of intralaminar screws with postoperative computed tomography (CT) at POD-6 months.
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) (36 pts), cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) (12 pts) were enrolled. Overall JOA scores improved from 11.49 to 14.22 at POD-6 months (OPLL: 11.32 -->14.3; CSM: 12-->14). Postoperative CT scans were performed in 39 patients at 177 levels for a total of 354 screws. The malpositioning rate of intralaminar screws was 3.4% and hardware-related neurologic complications did not occur.
CONCLUSION: Box-shape cervical expansive laminoplasty creates maximal spinal canal expansion and leads to improved cervical myelopathy. The use of intralaminar screws to fix the remodeled lamina-facet does not represent a significant difficulty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Box-shape laminoplasty; Double door laminoplasty; Intralaminar screw; Open door laminoplasty; Spinal canal area

Year:  2014        PMID: 25346761      PMCID: PMC4206966          DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Spine        ISSN: 1738-2262


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cervical laminoplasty: use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansion--surgical technique.

Authors:  Andrew E Park; John G Heller
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-08

2.  Laminectomy versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: brief report.

Authors:  S Hukuda; M Ogata; T Mochizuki; K Shichikawa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-03

3.  Modified double-door laminoplasty in managing multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical outcome in 520 patients and technique description.

Authors:  Masaaki Machino; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Tetsuro Hida; Keigo Ito; Hiroaki Nakashima; Shunsuke Kanbara; Daigo Morita; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2013-05

4.  A technique for cervical laminoplasty using mini plates.

Authors:  E Frank; T L Keenen
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; K Watanabe; K Wakano; N Suzuki; K Satomi; Y Ishii
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  J G Heller; C C Edwards ; H Murakami; G E Rodts
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Outcomes of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy in patients more than 75 years of age.

Authors:  Y Matsuda; T Shibata; S Oki; Y Kawatani; N Mashima; H Oishi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comparison of enlargement of the spinal canal after cervical laminoplasty: open-door type and double-door type.

Authors:  Shigeru Hirabayashi; Hironobu Yamada; Takao Motosuneya; Yoshinobu Watanabe; Makoto Miura; Hiroya Sakai; Takashi Matsushita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Y Uematsu; Y Tokuhashi; H Matsuzaki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.

Authors:  John K Ratliff; Paul R Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Change of Range of Motion at Anterior Compression of the Cervical Cord after Laminoplasty in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Yongjae Cho
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-12-31

2.  Factors associated with surgical outcomes of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Farid Yudoyono; Pyung Goo Cho; Sang Hyuk Park; Bong Ju Moon; Seong Yi; Yoon Ha; Keung Nyun Kim; Do Heum Yoon; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.